“…Twenty-two peer-reviewed articles around issues of risk in U.K. inpatient forensic settings for people with an intellectual disability were deemed suitable for inclusion. Of these, seven were quantitative/experimental designs (Campbell & McCue, 2013;Chester et al, 2017Chester et al, , 2018Fitzgerald et al, 2013;Hogue et al, 2007;Morris et al, 2021;Novaco & Taylor, 2015), five were qualitative (Duperouzel & Fish, 2010;Lovell et al, 2014;Malda-Castillo et al, 2018;Wright et al, 2014;Wood et al, 2008), four cohort studies (Russell et al, 2018;Lindsay, Carson, et al, 2013;Lindsay et al, 2012), There were two service evaluations/ audits (Alexander et al, 2015;Plant et al, 2011), two survey designs (Fish et al, 2012;Mason et al, 2011), one case study (Ashworth et al, 2020) and one study utilising the Delphi approach (Morrissey et al, 2017). Setting: forensic psychiatric hospital units The intellectual disability and non-ID groups were strikingly similar on many sociodemographic, clinical and forensic variables.…”