1999
DOI: 10.12968/jowc.1999.8.4.25863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prevalence of pressure damage in acute care hospital patients in the UK

Abstract: This paper aims to provide information on the prevalence of pressure damage in UK hospital patients since 1992. A survey method and data handling service provided by a medical device company was used to set targets and monitor trends. The results of these surveys provide evidence that over a six year period, the prevalence of pressure damage in this population in the UK has shown a significant reduction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The incidence of pressure ulcers was high compared with that in other studies (Gunningberg et al, 2000;Lahmann et al, 2006;Lindgren et al, 2004;O'Dea, 1999;Thoroddsen, 1999;Vanderwee et al, 2007a;Whittington et al, 2000). Fifty-five percent of the patients had pressure ulcers in the sacral area at discharge from the orthopaedic ward, 45% had Category I pressure ulcers, and 13% had Category II pressure ulcers.…”
Section: Methodological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The incidence of pressure ulcers was high compared with that in other studies (Gunningberg et al, 2000;Lahmann et al, 2006;Lindgren et al, 2004;O'Dea, 1999;Thoroddsen, 1999;Vanderwee et al, 2007a;Whittington et al, 2000). Fifty-five percent of the patients had pressure ulcers in the sacral area at discharge from the orthopaedic ward, 45% had Category I pressure ulcers, and 13% had Category II pressure ulcers.…”
Section: Methodological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Few prevalence and incidence studies describe a reliable methodology to define Category I pressure ulcers, and in some studies, Category I pressure ulcers are excluded. (O'Dea, 1999;Gunningberg, Lindholm, Carlsson, & Sjoden, 2000;Lahmann, Halfens, & Dasen, 2006;Lindgren et al, 2004;Thoroddsen, 1999;Vanderwee, Clark, Dealey, Gunningberg, & Defloor, 2007a;Whittington, Patrick, & Roberts, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, this problem was investigated in several countries and contexts at the beginning of the 1990s. A multicentre study involving institutions that provide acute care measured the prevalence of PU, including non-blanchable erythaema, in countries such as Germany (7%), Italy (9%), the Netherlands (15%), and the United Kingdom (18%) (6) . Other studies were conducted in Europe in the second half of the 1990s and at the beginning of the 21 st century, thus indicating an ongoing concern with this problem within the most diverse healthcare contexts.…”
Section: Prevalence Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Varying prevalence of pressure ulcers has been reported from different countries, ranging from 10.1% to 23.1% 4 8 – 10. Because of the lack of standardised methods for determining incidence and prevalence rates, these studies are not always comparable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%