2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2019.10.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prevalence of sarcopenic obesity and its association with cognitive performance in type 2 diabetes in Singapore

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
28
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
4
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has satisfactory psychometric properties and has been validated in the different populations including Singapore . Our group has previously published observations from our cohort based on these assessment tools . Those who did not undergo RBANS and/or MMSE screening typically had younger age, shorter T2D duration, higher adiposity, poorer glycaemic and lipid control, reduced microvascular reactivity, and lower education (Table ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has satisfactory psychometric properties and has been validated in the different populations including Singapore . Our group has previously published observations from our cohort based on these assessment tools . Those who did not undergo RBANS and/or MMSE screening typically had younger age, shorter T2D duration, higher adiposity, poorer glycaemic and lipid control, reduced microvascular reactivity, and lower education (Table ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, among the traditional anthropometric measures to diagnose sarcopenic obesity, a higher fat mass to fat-free mass (FM/FFM) ratio is considered as a valuable diagnostic criterion when BIA is used for measurement. Accordingly, FM/FFM ratio more than 0.80 was considered as a sarcopenic obesity (25).…”
Section: Diagnostic Measures For Sarcopenic Obesitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exclusion criteria were previously described. 12 Data collected up to October 2017 were analysed ( Figure 1). The final analysed cohort (N = 677) constituted older subjects aged ≥60 years (age range: 60-86 years).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%