2011
DOI: 10.5350/dajpn2011240102t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prevalence of suicidal behaviour and its correlation with certain sociodemographic variables in Sivas province

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been two studies that have used the SBQ-R to assess suicidality in the general population 30 . The prevalence of suicide risk in both of our samples far exceeds the prevalence observed in the general population studies of 4.6% 31,32 at its highest. This high suicide risk may be a consequence of the high prevalence of depression in our sample, which could therefore be reduced by ameliorating depressive symptoms, though this relationship requires testing.…”
Section: Clinical Cut-offscontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…There have been two studies that have used the SBQ-R to assess suicidality in the general population 30 . The prevalence of suicide risk in both of our samples far exceeds the prevalence observed in the general population studies of 4.6% 31,32 at its highest. This high suicide risk may be a consequence of the high prevalence of depression in our sample, which could therefore be reduced by ameliorating depressive symptoms, though this relationship requires testing.…”
Section: Clinical Cut-offscontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…It is a known fact that suicide behavior varies in different cultures. 14 Two separate studies conducted in similar designs, revealed the prevalences of lifetime suicide attempt in Turkey (3.5%) and in the USA (4.6%), concurring with the general belief on the lower rates of suicide attempt in Turkey compared to Western countries, 1 , 15 In 2 studies conducted with similar methods, lifetime suicide attempt rate was 3.5% in Turkey 15 and 4.6% in USA. 1 This result is reported to be affected from some cultural factors such as strong familial bonds, as well as religious factors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…We assessed 29 (78%) studies to be of high [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] or acceptable [44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58] quality (Table 3). Eight studies [59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66] were of low quality due to problems with risk of bias: performance, attrition and detection bias (interrupted-time series); selection bias, unclear case definitions, detection bias, lack of adjustment for confounding factors (case-control studies); detection bias, lack of adjustment for confounding factors (cross sectional and ecological studies).…”
Section: <Figure 1> <Table 2>mentioning
confidence: 99%