2008
DOI: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_45.03.280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Price Effect of Hospital Closures

Abstract: This paper analyzes the anti-competitive effect of hospital closures between 1993 and 1998. Using a modified rival analysis with difference-in-differences (DD) and difference-in-difference-in-differences (DDD) identification strategies, this study finds that competitors located nearest to closed hospitals were best able to improve their bargaining position. Moreover, rivals that experienced multiple neighborhood closures, that faced large closures relative to their own sizes, and that were located in more conc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also excluded non‐SNHs with no SNHs in their market because non‐SNHs located far from a SNH and those located near SNHs are likely to have different characteristics. This type of close rival analysis is similar to other studies (Lindrooth, Lo Sasso, and Bazzoli ; Dafny ; Wu ) that found proximity to be an important determinant of hospital decisions. Therefore, a non‐SNH located near an SNH is a potential competitor, regardless of the types of services they provide or the types of patients they serve.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…We also excluded non‐SNHs with no SNHs in their market because non‐SNHs located far from a SNH and those located near SNHs are likely to have different characteristics. This type of close rival analysis is similar to other studies (Lindrooth, Lo Sasso, and Bazzoli ; Dafny ; Wu ) that found proximity to be an important determinant of hospital decisions. Therefore, a non‐SNH located near an SNH is a potential competitor, regardless of the types of services they provide or the types of patients they serve.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…31,33 Wu found that 5 years after the closure of rival institutions, hospitals in the 1990s experienced, on average, a permanent price increase of 4%. 37 In addition, a multidecade study of heart disease patients found that interhospital competition was associated with lower expenditures after 1990, a period with a particularly high focus on managed care, but not before. 38 Other studies have suggested that in more recent years, the decline of the managed care environment has prompted hospitals to shift from price competition to nonprice competition strategies, like new technology or heightened amenities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found that hospital closures were associated with an approximate 6-8 percent increase in market concentration throughout the post-closure period. A prior analysis of hospital closures between 1993 and 1998 found that closures led to a one-time, permanent 4 percent increase in prices (Wu 2008). This finding, along with the plethora of evidence in the market concentration literature, suggests that hospital closures increased remaining hospitals' pricing power and, subsequently, medical debt among consumers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%