1991
DOI: 10.2307/2328839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Price Elasticity of Demand for Common Stock

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, estimates of this elasticity is higher for bonds than for other assets. These numbers are a bit lower than other estimates in the literature which found values between 6 and 12 for equities (see Loderer et al (1991), Wurgler and Zhuravskaya (2002) and Martin and Rey (2006) for a short survey of those elasticities). However, the elasticity we estimate is for assets from different countries whereas the literature has focused on the elasticity between assets of the same country.…”
Section: Tablecontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…As expected, estimates of this elasticity is higher for bonds than for other assets. These numbers are a bit lower than other estimates in the literature which found values between 6 and 12 for equities (see Loderer et al (1991), Wurgler and Zhuravskaya (2002) and Martin and Rey (2006) for a short survey of those elasticities). However, the elasticity we estimate is for assets from different countries whereas the literature has focused on the elasticity between assets of the same country.…”
Section: Tablecontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…Schipper and Smith (1986) examined 76 equity carve‐outs that took place over the period 1965 through 1983 and report an average excess return of +1.8 percent over a five‐day interval leading up to the carve‐out announcements. The increase in stock prices in response to carve‐outs is intriguing because a number of studies, including Asquith and Mullins (1986), Dann and Mikkelson (1984), Masulis and Korwar (1986), and Loderer, Cooney, and Van Drunen (1991), among others, report that seasoned equity issues are associated with an average stock price reaction of −2 to −3 percent.…”
Section: The Managerial Discretion Hypothesis and Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…See the discussion inKoeplin et al (2000, p. 95) andHertzel and Smith (1993).23 See, among others,Mikkelson and Partch (1985),Holthausen et al (1987),Ball and Finn (1989),Loderer et al (1991),Seppi (1992),Keim and Madhavan (1996),Cheng and Madhavan (1997), andSaar (2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%