2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The price of actor diversity: Measuring project developers’ willingness to accept risks in renewable energy auctions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because it captures preference heterogeneity very well, this approach is regarded as state-ofthe-art for measuring consumer preferences using DCEs [60]. Regression statistics pointed to a reasonably good model fit [61,62], with a Pseudo R-Squared of 0.62 and an average Root Likelihood value of 0.54, which is 2.75 times greater than the null likelihood value of 0.2 (1/5) for completely randomized choices between the five options in every choice set.…”
Section: Data Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because it captures preference heterogeneity very well, this approach is regarded as state-ofthe-art for measuring consumer preferences using DCEs [60]. Regression statistics pointed to a reasonably good model fit [61,62], with a Pseudo R-Squared of 0.62 and an average Root Likelihood value of 0.54, which is 2.75 times greater than the null likelihood value of 0.2 (1/5) for completely randomized choices between the five options in every choice set.…”
Section: Data Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in other auctions for renewable energy resources, competitive procurement of paired solar PV and BESS is subject to certain risks, hence returns for investors and economic and social impact; see, e.g., Maurer et al (2020), Cote et al (2022), andRoth et al (2022). Market designs of said auctions must therefore ensure that the benefit of market competition outweighs the cost.…”
Section: Risksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a risk is significant if the auctioned items are limited, i.e., fixed demand, and if such costs are large relative to the bidder's financial resources and project portfolio. Thus, smaller companies and local community organizations may be at a disadvantage, undermining auctions' diversity, equity, and equality, as well as ESG objectives (Eberhard et al, 2014;Amazo et al, 2021;Cote et al, 2022). As a rule of thumb, US$/tCO2e…”
Section: Biddingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite its relatively smaller impact on reducing support costs, policymakers could de-risk equity financing by reducing risks during project development, for instance, through low-risk auction designs such as smaller bid bond amounts, less stringent penalties, and demanding fewer material pre-qualifications like building permits. Risky auction designs involving high financial pre-qualifications or short realization periods could increase investors' required returns on equity by as much as 1.79 percentage points (Côté et al, 2022). However, these de-risking measures would most likely not alter the bidders' equity-return requirements and reduce support costs.…”
Section: De-risking Measures and Their Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%