2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2022.103594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The price of property rights: Institutions, finance, and economic growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show that local environmental legislation significantly reduces the employment growth of Chinese manufacturing firms, and the impact is relatively small, on the order of 3.07%, which is very close to the results of Liu et al ( 2017 ). However, this finding differs greatly from some existing studies on the economic effects of institutional reform, which state that institutional reforms, such as the protection of intellectual property rights, the establishment of financial market and the clarity of ownership, provide the necessary incentives to accumulate human and physical capital and improve the resource allocation efficiency, and thus can boost economic growth and labor demand (Alquist et al, 2022 ; Coccia, 2019 ; Lepore et al, 2018 ). One possible explanation for this difference is that China's environmental legislation mainly emphasizes the sharing of obligations.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…The results show that local environmental legislation significantly reduces the employment growth of Chinese manufacturing firms, and the impact is relatively small, on the order of 3.07%, which is very close to the results of Liu et al ( 2017 ). However, this finding differs greatly from some existing studies on the economic effects of institutional reform, which state that institutional reforms, such as the protection of intellectual property rights, the establishment of financial market and the clarity of ownership, provide the necessary incentives to accumulate human and physical capital and improve the resource allocation efficiency, and thus can boost economic growth and labor demand (Alquist et al, 2022 ; Coccia, 2019 ; Lepore et al, 2018 ). One possible explanation for this difference is that China's environmental legislation mainly emphasizes the sharing of obligations.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…Overall, this demonstrates that tax policy is more steering than subsidizing. The variables of access to investment and credit slack both produced negative regression results, emphasizing the financing environment's positive effect on firms' innovation efficiency (Alquist et al, 2022;Cull & Xu, 2005;Ribeiro & Shapira, 2020). Access to capital is an important factor in reducing firms' barriers to innovating, and financing institutions increase innovation effectiveness by reducing firms' costs of innovation while monitoring innovation-related actions of innovation agents (Long & Pelloni, 2017;Ribeiro & Shapira, 2020).…”
Section: Analysis Of Results Based On Sfa Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another factor which might explain the relative performance of the countries was their institutional setup. Recent work has highlighted the importance of the quality of institutions for growth and development through asset prices; see Alquist et al (2020). As previously stated, three of the four countries were effectively independent states with the Treaty of Berlin in 1878, 17 and they continued a process of nation building that started prior to independence.…”
Section: IIImentioning
confidence: 99%