1988
DOI: 10.1272/jnms1923.55.417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The primary and secondary structures of the ribosomal RNAs of Rana catesbeiana mitochondrion.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This sequence represents positions 345-553 of the Bufo sequences reported in this study. The sequence from Xenopus laevis is from Roe et al (1985) and the sequence from Rana catesbeiana is from Nagae (1988) show differences of eight to nine bases. Pairwise comparisons of DNA sequences among B. andrewsi populations show differences of up to 22 base substitutions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This sequence represents positions 345-553 of the Bufo sequences reported in this study. The sequence from Xenopus laevis is from Roe et al (1985) and the sequence from Rana catesbeiana is from Nagae (1988) show differences of eight to nine bases. Pairwise comparisons of DNA sequences among B. andrewsi populations show differences of up to 22 base substitutions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No length variation is observed among bufonids and comparison to a pipid (Xenopus laevis, Roe et al, 1985) and a ranid (Rana catesbeiana, Nagae, 1988) shows only one length-variable position where tRNA genes encoded on opposite strands overlap. This result suggests extreme conservation of tRNA genes among anurans (Fig.…”
Section: Genic Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In amphibians, the complete mtDNA sequences have been obtained in only two species, the clawed frog Xenopus laevis (Roe et al, 1985) and the caecilian Typhlonectes natans (Zardoya and Meyer, 2000). Partial sequence data on gene arrangements have been published in several anuran species: Rana catesbeiana (Yoneyama, 1987;Fujii et al, 1988;Nagae, 1988); Rhacophorus taipeianus (Yang et al, 1994); Rana limnocharis (Macey et al, 1997); Rana pipiens (Feller and Hedges, 1998); Rana nigromaculata and Rana porosa (Sumida et al, 2000b); Rana boylii (Macey et al, 2001). Examination of partial sequences from these Rana species mtDNAs suggests that frog mtDNA has a similar gene content but different genomic organization, and that several gene rearrangements have occurred in anurans.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%