1966
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9797(66)90017-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The primary electroviscous effect in a sulfonated polystyrene latex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these experiments, the shear viscosity of the bulk dispersion can be determined independently from the near surface layer and apparent boundary effects. The value of the apparent volume fraction increment, p, is 0.55 in the fully deionized sample and similar to that reported by Rubio-Hernańdez et al 24 for a weakly charged sulfonated latex. The value of p is larger than that calculated by simple theory such as that of Watterson and White; 29 previously, such values have been ascribed to the effects of nonuniformity and particle roughness.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In these experiments, the shear viscosity of the bulk dispersion can be determined independently from the near surface layer and apparent boundary effects. The value of the apparent volume fraction increment, p, is 0.55 in the fully deionized sample and similar to that reported by Rubio-Hernańdez et al 24 for a weakly charged sulfonated latex. The value of p is larger than that calculated by simple theory such as that of Watterson and White; 29 previously, such values have been ascribed to the effects of nonuniformity and particle roughness.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The increase in viscosity is expected and originates in particles getting more crowded at higher concentrations. Charged colloidal particles dispersed in an electrolyte have been studied by many groups, and it is recognized that the viscosity of these dispersions depends strongly on the volume fraction and the excess electrolyte concentration. There are also distinct electroviscous effects that alter both the extent of the diffuse double layer of ions surrounding each particle, known as the primary effect, and the secondary effect of electrostatic repulsion between the particles causing local differences in the velocities of particles and the surrounding fluid. The viscosity of dilute dispersions (below φ = 0.1) of hard spheres can be described according to Einstein’s viscosity equation: η = (1 + 2.5φ particles )­η solvent , where η is the viscosity and φ is the volume fraction of the particles in a Newtonian liquid with viscosity η solvent .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…D. Sherwood mental results for the electroviscous effect are tabulated in table 2 and plotted on figure 10. The agreement between theory and experiment is as good as that obtained by Chan & Goring (1966) or by Stone-Masui & Watillon (1968). Here we have the experimental advantage that the electroviscous effect is larger than the intrinsic viscosity of the uncharged molecules.…”
Section: Rods With No-slip Boundary Conditionssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Chan et al . used sulfonated polystyrene latex particles to study the influence of PEE on viscosity by varying ionic strength, and their results (PEE) were shown to be comparable (with experimental error) to the theoretical predictions from the equations of Smoluchowski and Booth (Chan and Goring, 1966). As for concentrated protein formulations, electroviscous effect (it is really referred to PEE in many papers) is considered not important, completely neglecting SEE (Zhang and Liu, 2017).…”
Section: Electroviscous Effectmentioning
confidence: 82%