The Principle of Pacta Sunt Servanda in Fintech Transactions is Reviewed Through The Perspective of Ushul Fiqh

Abstract

The principle of Pacta Sunt Servanda as part of the legal principle, which is commonly described as "agreement as applicable to the author" carries its own implications in the practice of society, where the public must perform the agreement cconsistently, consequent, and full of responsibility. No exception in transactions in Financial Technology (Fintech), the applicability of this principle to be a reference for both parties to equally believe that the transaction process (lending) between them can be held accountable in terms of moral-ethical laws. The purpose of this research is to describe the validity of the pacta sunt servanda of the agreement on Fintech and describe the pacta sunt servanda basis reviewed through the study of ushul fiqh to soften a concrete solution against legal problematics that exist on Fintech. The methods used in this study are juridical-normative. The results of the research show that with the trend of ease carried by the Fintech can erode the essence of the principle of the law itself, and create a destructive mindset which is an agreement of the regarded as administrative terms that need to be met when conducting transactions on Fintech, so that various provisions inherent to the unreached Fintech agreements. In addition to the absence

Generation Z perceptions in paying Zakat, Infaq, and Sadaqah using Fintech: A comparative study of Indonesia and Malaysia

“…On the other hand, risk negatively and significantly affects an interest in transacting using Fintech (Batunanggar, 2019). The ad-verse risk of using fintech is the misuse of personal data (Budiwati et al, 2020). Weak personal data security protections can lead to declining confidence in fintech innovations (Stewart & Jürjens, 2018;Yousafzai et al, 2005).…”

“…Partial proof of data exploitation and misuse is participants' viewpoint in Indonesia. Data misuse occurs when consumers' data is leaked or abused (Budiwati et al, 2020). The data breach affects consumers who frequently get texts to private numbers despite paying for ZIS.…”

IJARAH AND RIBA IN THE SHARIA CARD: Analysis Of ‘Illat Hukmi Of Sharia Card In The Adz-Dzari’ah Perspective

“…This lack of regulation necessitates questioning whether usury or the sharia card is permissible. Additionally, the intended purpose of releasing this sharia card is to fight usury in Indonesia, as stated in the fatwa's preamble, which reads, "That present credit cards use an interest-based system inconsistent with sharia principles" (Budiwati et al, 2020) even if the norms that come from ijtihad are far from ideal. This criterion precludes the sharia card usage due to the ongoing controversy about the presence of usury in practice.…”

The Use Of Sharia Fintech On MSMEs Performance: Mediation Of Interest In Use Of Transactions

“…Likewise, Rahmawati, Rahayu, Nivanty, and lutfiah (2020) that community constraints are still lagging behind in culture and don't want to change so that it hinders progress. Meanwhile, the results of the Risk Management Analysis of Murabahah Financing in Islamic Banks by Budiwati, Junaidi, and Nugroho (2020) found factors that cause financing risk, including HR (Human Resources) risk and operational performance risk. This is possibly another factor, namely the low interest in using fintech.…”