2013
DOI: 10.1159/000350206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Principle of Persistence, Leibniz's Law, and the Computational Task of Object Re-Identification

Abstract: Infant abilities to re-identify objects through time have been characterized in terms of a ‘‘principle of persistence'' [Baillargeon (2008): Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 2-13]. It is argued that the proposed principle of persistence has neither theoretical content nor explanatory power, and that object persistence is itself not an explanatory principle but rather an effect to be explained. The computational task of object re-identification across gaps in observation is characterized, and shown to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the size of the globular sets may vary, presheaves can be used for the assessment of different coarse-grained nervous structures at the micro-, meso-and macro-levels of observation. The human ability to re-identify objects at different times and across observation gaps leads to the phenomenon termed "object persistence" (Fields, 2013). The computational tasks required by object persistence can be tackled in terms of presheaf theory both at the microscopic level of histological microcolumns (Tozzi et al, 2017b) and at the macroscopic level of brain functional/anatomical areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the size of the globular sets may vary, presheaves can be used for the assessment of different coarse-grained nervous structures at the micro-, meso-and macro-levels of observation. The human ability to re-identify objects at different times and across observation gaps leads to the phenomenon termed "object persistence" (Fields, 2013). The computational tasks required by object persistence can be tackled in terms of presheaf theory both at the microscopic level of histological microcolumns (Tozzi et al, 2017b) and at the macroscopic level of brain functional/anatomical areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size of the globular sets may vary, so that presheaves can be used for the description of different coarse-grained nervous structures, both at the micro-and at the macro-levels of observation. Human ability to reidentify objects through time and across gaps in observation leads to the effect termed object persistence (Fields, 2013). The computational task of object persistence can be tackled in terms of presheaf theory, both at the microscopic level of histological microcolumns (Tozzi et al, 2017b) and at the macroscopic level of brain functional and anatomical areas.…”
Section: Conclusion: More Abstract Possibilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is, moreover, just an item of faith, sometimes explicitly propped up by appeals to Occam's razor, that systems do not undergo more radical alterations or even substitutions of one for another while we are not observing them. The cognitive mechanisms underlying this item of faith are becoming better understood, largely by studying their points of failure (Fields, 2012;Fields, 2013b;Fields, 2014b). Both cybernetics and quantum theory reminds us that this faith-driven inference of object identity through time is unsupportable, in principle, by finite observations.…”
Section: Physics Without Systems?mentioning
confidence: 99%