2017
DOI: 10.1080/09637494.2017.1389551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The principled slope: religious freedom and the European Court of Human Rights

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In its judgement regarding the 2010 law prohibiting the concealment of the face in public spaces (case S.A. S. v. France), the European Court of Human Rights refers to the so-called 'French principle of living together' to support the argument made by the French legislature that covering one's face impedes human relationships, necessary for living in society. This was not uncontroversial because of the perils of using general principles to limit religious freedom (Adrian 2017;Tsevas 2017). Moreover, vivre ensemble is also commonly used, but only seldom defined, by a variety of social and political actors when discussing laïcité.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In its judgement regarding the 2010 law prohibiting the concealment of the face in public spaces (case S.A. S. v. France), the European Court of Human Rights refers to the so-called 'French principle of living together' to support the argument made by the French legislature that covering one's face impedes human relationships, necessary for living in society. This was not uncontroversial because of the perils of using general principles to limit religious freedom (Adrian 2017;Tsevas 2017). Moreover, vivre ensemble is also commonly used, but only seldom defined, by a variety of social and political actors when discussing laïcité.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%