1995
DOI: 10.37236/1199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Prism of the Acyclic Orientation Graph is Hamiltonian

Abstract: Every connected simple graph $G$ has an acyclic orientation. Define a graph ${AO}(G)$ whose vertices are the acyclic orientations of $G$ and whose edges join orientations that differ by reversing the direction of a single edge. It was known previously that ${AO}(G)$ is connected but not necessarily Hamiltonian. However, Squire proved that the square ${AO}(G)^2$ is Hamiltonian. We prove the slightly stronger result that the prism ${AO}(G) \times e$ is Hamiltonian. If $G$ is a mixed graph (some edges directed, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This question was reiterated by Savage and Zhang [SZ98] and by Edelman (see [Sav97]). Towards this question, Squire [Squ94] showed that the square G 2 (H) has a Hamilton cycle for any graph H. Pruesse and Ruskey [PR95] strengthened this result and proved that the prism G(H) × P 2 , i.e., the Cartesian product of G(H) with a single edge, admits a Hamilton cycle. As G(H) is bipartite, this easily implies that G 2 (H) has a Hamilton cycle.…”
Section: Acyclic Orientationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This question was reiterated by Savage and Zhang [SZ98] and by Edelman (see [Sav97]). Towards this question, Squire [Squ94] showed that the square G 2 (H) has a Hamilton cycle for any graph H. Pruesse and Ruskey [PR95] strengthened this result and proved that the prism G(H) × P 2 , i.e., the Cartesian product of G(H) with a single edge, admits a Hamilton cycle. As G(H) is bipartite, this easily implies that G 2 (H) has a Hamilton cycle.…”
Section: Acyclic Orientationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These acyclic reorientations posets and the underlying acyclic orientation flip graphs have been extensively studied, in particular for counting [Sta73,Las01], traversing [SSW93,PR95], and generating [Squ98,BS99] all acyclic orientations of a graph. This paper considers these acyclic reorientation posets from a lattice theoretic perspective: after characterizing the directed acyclic graphs D for which AR D is a lattice, we explore lattice properties of AR D , in particular the combinatorics and geometry of the lattice quotients of AR D when it turns out to be semidistributive.…”
Section: Introduction and Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When R = ∅, AO R (G) is the acyclic orientations graph of G. AO R (G) becomes the linear extensions adjacency graph of an n element poset P when when G = K n and R and σ R are defined by the covering relations in P . In contrast to the situation for linear extensions and acyclic orientations, the square of AO R (G) is not necessarily hamiltonian.Counterexamples appear in[Squ94c] and[PR95].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%