2016
DOI: 10.5194/cp-12-1519-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The PRISM4 (mid-Piacenzian) paleoenvironmental reconstruction

Abstract: Abstract. The mid-Piacenzian is known as a period of relative warmth when compared to the present day. A comprehensive understanding of conditions during the Piacenzian serves as both a conceptual model and a source for boundary conditions as well as means of verification of global climate model experiments. In this paper we present the PRISM4 reconstruction, a paleoenvironmental reconstruction of the mid-Piacenzian ( ∼ 3 Ma) containing data for paleogeography, land and sea ice, sea-surface temperature, vegeta… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
349
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 239 publications
(359 citation statements)
references
References 133 publications
(166 reference statements)
9
349
1
Order By: Relevance
“…decreases in both mean SST [estimated mean Pliocene−Recent difference for California: 2.1°C; for Virginia: 2.9°C (18,20)] and diversities; regional extinctions have also been documented on both coasts, although their direct connection to climate change is debated and other factors may also have been involved (20,(23)(24)(25)29). Consistent with the previous work cited above (e.g., refs.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…decreases in both mean SST [estimated mean Pliocene−Recent difference for California: 2.1°C; for Virginia: 2.9°C (18,20)] and diversities; regional extinctions have also been documented on both coasts, although their direct connection to climate change is debated and other factors may also have been involved (20,(23)(24)(25)29). Consistent with the previous work cited above (e.g., refs.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…By focusing on the Pliocene bivalves in the two bestsampled temperate regions along each coast [California and the Carolinas−Virginia region (hereafter termed Virginia), both at ∼32°N-40°N], living at a time when extratropical temperatures were warmer and latitudinal temperature gradients gentler than today (18)(19)(20), we can begin to tease apart the complex roles of regional extinction and range expansion in shaping present-day patterns of species richness (hereafter termed diversity). For comparison, we summarized modern diversity within the same latitudinal bins, rather than using the natural provincial boundaries, to assess local extinctions from Pliocene to Recent.…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 11 shows comparison of simulated SST and PRISM3D proxy-based SST reconstruction during the Pliocene . Note that the PRISM4 SST reconstruction is not updated (Dowsett et al, 2016) since PRISM3D. The SST reconstruction is characterized as extremely high SST in the North Atlantic high latitude, low-to-mid-latitude warming gradient (limited change in the tropics and warming in the middle latitude, respectively), and remarkable warming in mid-latitude coastal areas (off the west coast of North America and South America, and off the east coast of the Eurasian Continent; Dowsett et al, 2009Dowsett et al, , 2013.…”
Section: Data-model Comparison Of Sstmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the PRISM3D/PlioMIP1, newly archived proxy evidences have been integrated as PRISM4 dataset (Dowsett et al, 2016;hereafter D16) which is planned to be used for an ongoing modelling intercomparison project, PlioMIP phase 2 (PlioMIP2; Haywood et al, 2016b; hereafter H16b), a part project of PMIP4 (Kageyama et al, 2016). In the PRISM4/PlioMIP2, boundary conditions for the Pliocene climate simulations including orography and ice sheets have been updated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This period of the late Pliocene was selected because it has been extensively studied as part of a number of projects (e.g. PRISM; Dowsett et al, 2016;Dowsett, 2007, PlioMIP;Haywood et al, 2010Haywood et al, , 2016, represents the warm phase of climate (interglacial conditions) and does not include major glaciations -though the M2 cooling event may persist to the very start of the simulation at 3300 kyr BP, and the simulated period does include periods of likely glaciation, such as KM2 (∼ 3100 kyr BP) and G20 (∼ 3000 kyr BP). The emulator would not be appropriate for periods of extensive glaciation and may not be well-matched to the periods of lesser glaciation included within the simulated interval.…”
Section: Time Series Datamentioning
confidence: 99%