The privacy protection behaviours of the mobile app users: exploring the role of neuroticism and protection motivation theory

Chennamaneni, Anitha; Gupta, Babita

doi:10.1080/0144929x.2022.2106307

Cited by 11 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 104 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Technology often involves collecting and analysing personal data for various purposes, raising concerns about individual autonomy. The erosion of privacy can impact individuals' ability to control their personal information, leading to heightened stress and a sense of vulnerability (Chennamaneni & Gupta, 2023). The prevalence of social media and other online platforms can contribute to constant social comparison as individuals engage in self-presentation and peer comparison, which can impact mental health by fostering feelings of inadequacy, anxiety, or depression as individuals perceive discrepancies between their own lives and the curated representations of others (Mann & Blumberg, 2022).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Health, Technology And Built Environment Nexus: A Systematic Literature Review

Ndimako,

Sholanke

2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research into health, particularly social and psychological health, is crucial. Ultimately, an in-depth understanding of social and psychological health will more than promote well-being. Technology research is indispensable, particularly concerning health and the built environment, given the need to create holistic and supportive frameworks for well-being. Moreover, because literature reviews establish the foundation for academic inquiries, they provide valuable overviews for foresight into grey research areas, particularly multi-disciplinary research like health technology and the built environment. Hence, this study aims to discover the existing themes on health, technology, and built-environment nexus subjects while revealing the grey areas and suggesting proactive areas for future research. The objectives drove this aim to: 1. investigate the implications of technology for the social and psychological dimensions of health; 2. uncover the likelihood of a nexus between health, technology, and the built environment; and 3. highlight new research perspectives for the concluding seven years of the SDGs (2024–2030). The review results highlighted ten themes around which a nexus exists between health, technology, and the built environment; they also pointed out new research perspectives for the next seven years (up to 2023).

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Health, Technology And Built Environment Nexus: A Systematic Literature Review

Ndimako,

Sholanke

2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Failure to move from exploratory to confirmatory methods implies that privacy fatigue research will remain immature, unable to empirically substantiate theoretical matters such as what is sufficient in terms of statistical accuracy. Future research could, for example, use protection motivation theory, which is well suited to some privacy fatigue research because of its focus on the role of threats and risks [39][40][41], especially when considering that threats and risks featured prominently in this review (Figure 6). Additionally, of all the articles reviewed, only two used a privacy-centric theoretical framework (see Figure 2), and despite privacy concerns also featuring prominently as an antecedent, none of the reviewed articles used (or adapted) established privacy frameworks focused on modeling privacy concerns.…”

Section: Methodology and Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

Online Privacy Fatigue: A Scoping Review and Research Agenda

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Online users are responsible for protecting their online privacy themselves: the mantra is custodiat te (protect yourself). Even so, there is a great deal of evidence pointing to the fact that online users generally do not act to preserve the privacy of their personal information, consequently disclosing more than they ought to and unwisely divulging sensitive information. Such self-disclosure has many negative consequences, including the invasion of privacy and identity theft. This often points to a need for more knowledge and awareness but does not explain why even knowledgeable users fail to preserve their privacy. One explanation for this phenomenon may be attributed to online privacy fatigue. Given the importance of online privacy and the lack of integrative online privacy fatigue research, this scoping review aims to provide researchers with an understanding of online privacy fatigue, its antecedents and outcomes, as well as a critical analysis of the methodological approaches used. A scoping review based on the PRISMA-ScR checklist was conducted. Only empirical studies focusing on online privacy were included, with nontechnological studies being excluded. All studies had to be written in English. A search strategy encompassing six electronic databases resulted in eighteen eligible studies, and a backward search of the references resulted in an additional five publications. Of the 23 studies, the majority were quantitative (74%), with fewer than half being theory driven (48%). Privacy fatigue was mainly conceptualized as a loss of control (74% of studies). Five categories of privacy fatigue antecedents were identified: privacy risk, privacy control and management, knowledge and information, individual differences, and privacy policy characteristics. This study highlights the need for greater attention to be paid to the methodological design and theoretical underpinning of future research. Quantitative studies should carefully consider the use of CB-SEM or PLS-SEM, should aim to increase the sample size, and should improve on analytical rigor. In addition, to ensure that the field matures, future studies should be underpinned by established theoretical frameworks. This review reveals a notable absence of privacy fatigue research when modeling the influence of privacy threats and invasions and their relationship with privacy burnout, privacy resignation, and increased self-disclosure. In addition, this review provides insight into theoretical and practical research recommendations that future privacy fatigue researchers should consider going forward.

show abstract

“…Verwiesen sei hier vor allem auf Ansätze, die die Theorie der Schutzmotivation (Protection Motivation Theory – PMT) von Rogers [ 28 ] referenzieren und fordern, dass Informationspflichten anhand der PMT entworfen werden müssen [ 29 – 33 ]. Die Forschung hierzu steht jedoch noch ganz am Anfang und es gibt erst wenige Arbeiten, die konkrete Informationspflichten in diesem Sinne konzipieren, beispielsweise zur Cookie-Einwilligung [ 34 ] oder zur Einwilligung bei Gesundheits-Apps (siehe Dissertationsschrift von Freye M, Publikation vsl. 2024).…”

Section: Digitale Souveränität Dank Einwilligung?unclassified

Digitale Gesundheitstechnologien – das Recht als Hemmschuh oder Wegbereiter?

Freye,

Buchner

2024

Bundesgesundheitsbl

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ZusammenfassungDer potenzielle Nutzen digitaler Gesundheitstechnologien hängt im Bereich der populationsbezogenen Gesundheitsforschung maßgeblich davon ab, ob und in welchem Umfang sich diese Technologien auf eine Verarbeitung personenbezogener Gesundheitsdaten stützen lassen. Allerdings herrscht erhebliche Unsicherheit bei der Anwendung und Auslegung der einschlägigen rechtlichen Regelungen zur Verarbeitung von Forschungsdaten mittels digitaler Gesundheitstechnologien. Die Praxis der Forschungsdatenverarbeitung ist immer noch maßgeblich vom Primat der Einwilligung als Legitimationsgrundlage für eine Datenverarbeitung geprägt, obwohl das Informationsmodell des deutschen und europäischen Gesetzgebers mit seinen ambitionierten Anforderungen an die freiwillige und informierte Einwilligung realitätsfern ist. Auch die Konzepte des Broad Consent, Dynamic Consent und Meta Consent, die Alternativen zur klassischen Einwilligungslösung darstellen, können nicht sämtliche Defizite des Einwilligungsmodells beheben.Um die informationelle Selbstbestimmung der betroffenen Personen zu gewährleisten und gleichzeitig die Interessen der Forschung im Public-Health-Bereich im Blick zu behalten, muss der Forschungsdatenschutz weiterentwickelt werden. Lösungen müssen dabei nicht nur am Einwilligungsverhalten selbst ansetzen, sondern auch eine Legitimation der Datenverarbeitung ganz ohne Einwilligung in den Blick nehmen oder auf eine unwiederbringliche Aufhebung des Personenbezugs der Daten abzielen. Dieser Diskussionsartikel beleuchtet die ambivalente Rolle des Rechts im Hinblick auf digitale Gesundheitstechnologien und zeigt, dass der oftmals als Hindernis verstandene Gesundheitsdatenschutz – bei entsprechender Weiterentwicklung – durchaus den Weg für digitale Gesundheitstechnologien bereiten kann.

show abstract

The privacy protection behaviours of the mobile app users: exploring the role of neuroticism and protection motivation theory

Cited by 11 publications

References 104 publications

Health, Technology And Built Environment Nexus: A Systematic Literature Review

Health, Technology And Built Environment Nexus: A Systematic Literature Review

Online Privacy Fatigue: A Scoping Review and Research Agenda

Digitale Gesundheitstechnologien – das Recht als Hemmschuh oder Wegbereiter?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About