2019
DOI: 10.3386/w26598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Private and External Costs of Germany's Nuclear Phase-Out

Abstract: which provided support for the completion of this research. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research.NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact is that new LWR plants, properly operated, meet strenuous safety standards (MIT 2003), and a recent estimate presented in Figure 1 shows that nuclear energy is among the safest energy sources. Furthermore, it is estimated that 1100 people die annually due to the phase-outs of the German nuclear power plants (Jarvis, Deschenes, and Jha 2019) due to poorer air quality.…”
Section: Nuclear Safety Waste Management and Proliferation Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact is that new LWR plants, properly operated, meet strenuous safety standards (MIT 2003), and a recent estimate presented in Figure 1 shows that nuclear energy is among the safest energy sources. Furthermore, it is estimated that 1100 people die annually due to the phase-outs of the German nuclear power plants (Jarvis, Deschenes, and Jha 2019) due to poorer air quality.…”
Section: Nuclear Safety Waste Management and Proliferation Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to social and political pressure, Germany has decided to shut down all the nuclear power powers by 2022 and replace them with plants generating electricity from clean and renewable sources. Germany has already shut down 10 nuclear reactors until now by the following years: 8 reactors in 2011 (8.4 GW of capacity), 1 reactor in 2015 (1.3 GW of capacity), 1 reactor in 2017 (1.3 GW of capacity), and the remaining 6 nuclear power reactors in operation will be closed in 2022 [36]. Germany aims to reduce carbon emissions by shutting off the nuclear power stations at least 80% by 2050 relative to 1990 levels [37], however; according to a study conducted by the researchers at the University of California at Berkeley, the environmental effects of Germany's nuclear power rejection was miscalculated and resulted in releasing extra 36 million tons of carbon dioxide per year which increase emission about 5% [36].…”
Section: Dilemma Of Non-governmental Organizations (Ngos)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the Indian Point nuclear power plant in New York was decommissioned, the state saw its greenhouse gas emissions from power plants rise nearly 15% [7]. A similar situation occurred after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident, where the reactionary phaseout of a large portion of Germany's nuclear fleet between 2011 and 2017 led to a 13% increase in power grid CO2 emissions [8]. Not only is nuclear power capable of replacing fossil fuels while simultaneously buttressing intermittent renewable sources, but it does so by using 75 times less land than solar PV plants and 360 times less land than wind farms for the same amount of electricity [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%