1980
DOI: 10.1017/s0373463300040741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Probability of Close Overtaking in Fog

Abstract: In areas of high marine traffic density it has been necessary for IMCO to introduce traffic separation schemes to reduce the total number of encounters, and in particular the dangerous head-on encounters. It is now widely acknowledged that separation schemes can and do improve safety. However, as a side effect they unfortunately increase the number of overtaking encounters. For example the introduction of a separation scheme in the Dover Strait (with 1 per cent of ‘through rogues’) has increased threefold the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tendency observed for better-qualified officers to react more quickly was substantiated by a previous study 6 in which it was noted that more experienced subjects were more effective at resolving an overtaking encounter efficiently by not passing dangerously close and not allowing an unnecessarily great amount of sea room for safety.…”
Section: Own Ship Bp {Initially 12khmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The tendency observed for better-qualified officers to react more quickly was substantiated by a previous study 6 in which it was noted that more experienced subjects were more effective at resolving an overtaking encounter efficiently by not passing dangerously close and not allowing an unnecessarily great amount of sea room for safety.…”
Section: Own Ship Bp {Initially 12khmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Derivation of the expressions used to quantify the risk associated with drawing clear was based on the assumption that the manoeuvring phase is completed well before the passing and drawing clear phase takes place, and that consequently the course separation during the second phase is + D for overtaking and + D for meeting encounters. Following to some degree the ideas used by Curtis 3 and Cahill, 4 it was conjectured that a measurement of the risk associated with the passing phase could be derived from the time interval during which a 90 0 turn by either ship was likely to lead to a collision. It was found mathematically convenient to take the time during which the relative velocity vector effective after the turn passed within a distance L v equal to the mean length of ships measured from the central point of both vessels (Fig.…”
Section: The Methods Of W E I G H T I N Gmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This additional reaction time means that a considerable extra track separation must be allowed if there is still to be time to avoid collision should an unexpected manoeuvre occur'. 3 Aspect is of further importance in that it allows an immediate assessment of the difference in courses between the two vessels. Thus a vessel on a relative bearing of 40 0 can be determined, from the aspect alone to be, in one case, paralleling the own ship's course or in another, crossing and consequently a potential threat.…”
Section: The Development Of the M Arin E R -C O N T R O Lled Model Anmentioning
confidence: 99%