1977
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198244127.001.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Probable and The Provable

Abstract: The book was planned and written as a single, sustained argument. But earlier versions of a few parts of it have appeared separately. The object of this book is both to establish the existence of the paradoxes, and also to describe a non-Pascalian concept of probability in terms of which one can analyse the structure of forensic proof without giving rise to such typical signs of theoretical misfit. Neither the complementational principle for negation nor the multiplicative principle for conjunction applies to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
227
0
21

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 724 publications
(255 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
227
0
21
Order By: Relevance
“…From a logical perspective, inductive hypothesis testing and belief update are mostly viewed (but see Cohen, 1977) as a change in the epistemic probability p that a hypothesis H is true (as opposed to false, corresponding to the probability that its complement, ¬H, is true) after acquiring a piece of evidence E, with respect to the probability that H was true before E was acquired. A widespread formal method of belief update is Bayes' rule.…”
Section: Basic Formal Concepts About Hypothesis Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a logical perspective, inductive hypothesis testing and belief update are mostly viewed (but see Cohen, 1977) as a change in the epistemic probability p that a hypothesis H is true (as opposed to false, corresponding to the probability that its complement, ¬H, is true) after acquiring a piece of evidence E, with respect to the probability that H was true before E was acquired. A widespread formal method of belief update is Bayes' rule.…”
Section: Basic Formal Concepts About Hypothesis Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, degrees of belief cannot always be satisfactorily described with the classical axioms of Kolmogorov, something which has been recognized and confirmed by many researchers from such different disciplines as mathematics [1,[11][12][13]16], legal science [1], and philosophy (see [3,4,6,16] and references therein). These authors have argued that the classical axioms of probability are too restrictive for at least two reasons:…”
Section: P(a ∪ B) = P(a) + P(b) − P(a ∩ B)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Independently, the connection between numerical possibility and similarity was investigated by Sudkamp [131]. L. J. Cohen A framework very similar to the one of Shackle was proposed by the philosopher L. J. Cohen [32] who considered the problem of legal reasoning. He introduced socalled Baconian probabilities understood as degrees of provability.…”
Section: Lewismentioning
confidence: 99%