2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.09.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The problem of achieving high second-order nonlinearities in glasses: The role of electronic conductivity in poling of high index glasses

Abstract: a b s t r a c tEfficient thermal poling of electronically conducting glass is prevented by the inherent difficulty to record a large electrostatic field within such glasses. To overcome this limitation, a waveguide/substrate configuration has been proposed, in which the glass for poling was deposited as a film of appropriate thickness on a substrate chosen for its higher ionic conductivity. Owing to this configuration, the poling voltage drops entirely across the glass film, allowing high electrostatic field t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3,[15][16][17] The extent of electro-thermal poling has been shown to be dependent on both ionic and electronic conductivities. 4 The dielectric response of the depletion layer and bulk glass during poling also remains unclear, as we note that the dielectric constant of alkali silicate glasses increases with increasing alkali content. …”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3,[15][16][17] The extent of electro-thermal poling has been shown to be dependent on both ionic and electronic conductivities. 4 The dielectric response of the depletion layer and bulk glass during poling also remains unclear, as we note that the dielectric constant of alkali silicate glasses increases with increasing alkali content. …”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Electro-thermal poling was primarily developed to induce secondorder nonlinear (SONL) optical susceptibility in glasses by application of DC electric fields. [1][2][3][4] In recent years, interest in this technique has expanded beyond SONL to enhance a variety of biological, physical and chemical properties of glass.5-18 For example, electro-thermal poling has been reported to modify a glass' affinity to atmospheric water at the anode region.18 Electro-thermal poling generally comprises of four main processing steps. First, a glass is heated to a predetermined poling temperature (T p ) below the glass transition temperature (T g ), which allows for increased ionic conductivity while retaining the preformed dimensions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As most of the poling treatments reported in literature were carried out in air, one cannot under estimate the respective influence of the compensation mechanisms detailed in a previous section of this manuscript. Finally, if the glass electronic conductivity is no more negligible during the poling treatment, it could prevent high fields to be recorded in the glass. Such a behavior has been clearly shown in bismuth‐zinc‐borate‐poled glasses in which it exists a well‐known polaronic conduction whereby electron can hope between the two valence states of bismuth . Then, if electronic conduction is certainly negligible in silicate‐ or phosphate‐based glasses, one cannot avoid to take into account this negative charge motion mechanism in some of the high‐χ (3) glass families such as tellurites or chalcogenides.…”
Section: Thermally Poled Glasses: Progress Toward Photonic Applicatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this does not necessarily correspond to the highest field strength that silica glass can withstand. In the bismuth zinc borate ternary glass system we tested three films of different thickness deposited on borosilicate substrate [5]. The I-V curves reveal the existence of the onset of a nonohmic current initiating, for all film thicknesses, at field strengths of 2.87  0.26 × 10 8 V/m corresponding to  (2) = 1.41  0.12 pm/V in reasonable agreement with  (2) = 1.20  0.04 obtained from maker fringe measurements (Fig.1c).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%