2006
DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000247964.47706.5d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Problem of Artifacts in Patient Monitor Data During Surgery: A Clinical and Methodological Review

Abstract: Artifacts are a significant problem affecting the accurate display of information during surgery. They are also a source of false alarms. A secondary problem is the inadvertent recording of artifactual and inaccurate information in automated record keeping systems. Though most of the currently available patient monitors use techniques to minimize the effect of artifacts, their success is limited. We reviewed the problem of artifacts affecting patient monitor data during surgical cases. Methods adopted by curre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To decrease the effects of technical and biological artefacts [9] during haemodynamic evaluations, we used the mean value of several sets of measurements to form clinical decisions. In this article, we have focused on the precision of flow (cardiac index) and volumetric preload (GEDVI) parameters from the TPTD technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To decrease the effects of technical and biological artefacts [9] during haemodynamic evaluations, we used the mean value of several sets of measurements to form clinical decisions. In this article, we have focused on the precision of flow (cardiac index) and volumetric preload (GEDVI) parameters from the TPTD technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Devices adhering to the Association of the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation standards (mean difference between auscultatory and oscillometric devices is ±5 mm Hg, with a standard deviation ≤8 mm Hg) are typically used in acute care environments (White et al, 1993). Clinical situations such as irregular heart rhythms (Anastas, Jimerson, & Garolis, 2008;Pickering et al, 2005;Systems, 2002), patient movement (Takla, Petre, Doyle, Horibe, & Gopakumaran, 2006;Systems, 2002), severe shock, hypothermia (Davis et al, 2003;Systems, 2002), and obesity (Araghi, Bander, & Guzman, 2006;Systems, 2002) may limit oscillometric device accuracy.…”
Section: Oscillometric Blood Pressure Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these artifacts directly influence the measured signals (11) , leading to incorrect measurements and this, in turn, triggers the alarm. Most common artifacts in day to day practice is shown in table-1.…”
Section: Artifacts: a Common Source Of False Alarmmentioning
confidence: 99%