The problem of comparison in comparative regionalism

Abstract

Abstract. There is virtually no systematic debate on the fundamentals of comparative research in the study of international regionalism. The field of research is very fragmented and there is a lack of interaction between EU studies and regionalism in the rest of the world. There is also a lack of communication between scholars from various theoretical standpoints and research traditions. Related to these two divides is the tension between idiographic and nomothetic methodologies. The purpose of this article is to contribute to the largely neglected debate on how to conduct and address three interrelated problems: a conceptual, a theoretical and a methodological one. Our claim is that the future of comparative regionalism should be one where old divides are bridged. This requires a combination of conceptual rigor, theoretical eclecticism, and sounder empirical research methods. Philippe De Lombaerde is Associate Director of the UNU Institute on ComparativeRegional Integration Studies (UNU-CRIS) in Bruges. He recently edited: The EU and World

Theorising regions through changes in statehood: rethinking the theory and method of comparative regionalism

“…One particular region or regional organisation can easily deliver (or be disaggregated into) several 'cases' depending on the research questions that are addressed. 82 These authors advocate matching case studies to the research problem and chosen conceptual and theoretical framework. Not every comparison is worthwhile, they claim, but the variety of case studies extends well beyond the formal regional organisations or geographically proximate regional groupings.…”

“…11 With such fundamental disagreements it is clear why comparative regionalism has often been such a fraught exercise. 12 Indeed, the main questions, upon which there is currently limited agreement, are very basic -how to define regions; what drives their emergence; how they relate to other levels of governance and government and the international system as a whole; and finally, how to compare them. 13 The exception is EU studies, where because of the ( problematique) sui generis assumptions of many the focus has shifted to middlerange theory.…”

Beyond the Border Between the North and the South: Towards a Decolonization of Epistemologies and Fields of Research on Mercosur

“…The European literature already attested to the problem of Eurocentrism in comparison of experiences of integration that exist outside the EU 46 . Actually, the debate began in the 1960s with Ernest Haas 47 (1961) about the possibility of imitating the European archetype in other regions.…”

La Alianza del Pacifico: nueva muestra del regionalismo en América Latina

“…A diferencia de la regionalización, que es un proceso espontáneo de cooperación, cohesión, e incluso integración, dentro de un espacio regional, el regionalismo es un proceso de arriba-abajo (top-down process), en el que un conjunto de políticas y proyectos formales de los gobiernos busca crear instituciones o acuerdos entre diferentes actores estatales y no estatales de una región (De Lombaerde, Söderbaum, van Langenhove y Baert, 2009). Por su parte, Briceño (2013) argumenta que el regionalismo se define como un proceso de tipo asociativo que se produce en ámbitos espaciales delimitados denominados "'macroregiones' o regiones internacionales".…”