A resistivity cross section to depths exceeding 200 km has been derived from magnetotelluric observations along a profile near latitude 45øN from the Juan de Fuca spreading center, across the coastal subduction complex, the High Cascades volcanic arc, and into the back-arc Deschutes Basin region. In this two-dimensional interpretation, emphasis was placed on data approximating the transverse magnetic mode since these data are relatively robust to common departures from the two-dimensional assumption. The vertical magnetic field, however, has been very valuable in defining structure of the offshore sediments, of the oceanic asthenosphere and below the arc volcanics of the Westem and High Cascades. The transverse electric data on land suffer a variety of three-dimensional effects, making their interpretation very difficult. In contrast, the greater uniformity of upper crustal conditions on the seafloor allowed a good fit to both modes of the impedance plus the vertical magnetic field at least down to 104 s' Important components of . While a number of aspects of the subsurface resistivity can be deduced straight from inspection of the data, computer simulation of the observations helps to quantify more rigorously the permissible or required structures. In this paper, we derive a two-dimensional resistivity model, with a presumed northsouth strike, by trial-and-error fitting of our MT measurements with a finite element forward modeling algorithm. Constraints on model geometry from independent geological or geophysical investigations have been incorporated where justified. Our paper is divided into three major sections. First, we explain the approach toward two-dimensional modeling. On land, the transverse magnetic (TM) impedance functions are emphasized because theory and experience show that they are more robust to plausible three-dimensional effects in the region than are the vertical magnetic field or, especially, the transverse electric (TE) impedance. Upper crustal structure on the seafloor appears to be rhuch simpler than on land, however, and both modes of impedance plus the vertical field are fit fairly well. Second, the model cross section is described and its goodness of fit to the data demonstrated. Model uniqueness is investigated by perturbing certain features of the model and assessing the increase in misfit.