1983
DOI: 10.1007/bf01453996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The problem of current channelling: A critical review

Abstract: Abstract. The notion that currents induced 'elsewhere', by external source fields, could wend their way in a frequency-independent ohmic-like manner through a region of interest has been the cause of many recent disputes within the geomagnetic induction community. In particular, two-dimensional (2D) models of the Rhinegraben, and of the region known as the 'Eskdalemuir anomaly' in southern Scotland, have been dismissed as erroneous by those who believe that the observations are more correctly interpreted as du… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
67
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
5
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, such an interpretation yields a cross section which may be somewhat incorrect in its surficial features but represents accurately the regional resistivity structure of interest provided the regional structure itself is not arbitrarily three-dimensional [Jones, 1983;Bostick, 1986;Kariya, 1986;Wannarnaker, 1989, in press]. For two-dimensional modeling, the MT functions should be defined using a fixed coordinate system approximating the strike direction to overcome unwanted effects of near-surface structure, specifically on the impedance phase [Wannamaker et al, 1984].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, such an interpretation yields a cross section which may be somewhat incorrect in its surficial features but represents accurately the regional resistivity structure of interest provided the regional structure itself is not arbitrarily three-dimensional [Jones, 1983;Bostick, 1986;Kariya, 1986;Wannarnaker, 1989, in press]. For two-dimensional modeling, the MT functions should be defined using a fixed coordinate system approximating the strike direction to overcome unwanted effects of near-surface structure, specifically on the impedance phase [Wannamaker et al, 1984].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These fluctuations arise from electric charge distributions originating wherever the field crosses resistivity boundaries [Price, 1973;Jones, 1983;Wannamaker et al, 1984]. The charge in turn reflects the requirement that electric current across boundaries be continuous.…”
Section: Transverse Magnetic Impedance Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jones (1983), Wanamaker et al (1984), Berdichevsky et al (1998), Park & Mackie (2000), Ledo et al (2002) and Ledo (2005) studied the limitations of 2-D interpretation of 3-D MT data and made various recommendations, showing some situations where 2-D inversion of 3-D data can properly reproduce the geoelectrical subsurface when the content in the 2-D modes is appropriately chosen for inversion. Siripunvaraporn et al (2005b) suggest that if the data are 3-D in nature but collected along a profile rather than on a grid, the results from the 3-D inversion of the MT profile are superior to the results obtained by performing 2-D inversion of the same data, even with the far coarser mesh employed in 3-D as compared to 2-D inversion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%