2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11191-013-9670-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Problem of Pseudoscience in Science Education and Implications of Constructivist Pedagogy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
12
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, they take their lines to heart, such as: Scientific ideas are tentative and open to change (NRC, 1996). Such statements serve many conservative and liberal educators as a lever to distort science (Muğaloğlu, 2014;Muğaloğlu & Erduran 2012). Even though the final version of the NRC dismisses the term postmodernist, Matthews (2000) says it has not been deleted but only relocated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, they take their lines to heart, such as: Scientific ideas are tentative and open to change (NRC, 1996). Such statements serve many conservative and liberal educators as a lever to distort science (Muğaloğlu, 2014;Muğaloğlu & Erduran 2012). Even though the final version of the NRC dismisses the term postmodernist, Matthews (2000) says it has not been deleted but only relocated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approval of those pseudoscientific claims by the community and educated individuals such as university students was warranted partly with the impact of television programs (Tseng, Tsai, Hsieh, Hung & Huang, 2014). Also Mugaloglu (2014) indicated that learners are accepted existing pseudoscientific beliefs because of exposing to alternative constructions through social negotiation than to furthering their appreciation of science. However, it is well known that believing in pseudoscientific claims has mediate and immediate harms (Lindem, 2014) and to develop educational practices in order to create public awareness against them is crucial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yapılandırmacılığa ilişkin Türkiye'de bir eleştiri yazısı bulmak ise son derece zordur. Nadir de olsa net bir anlatımla Muğaloğlu (2014), yapılandırmacılık ile sahte bilim arasında ilişki kurmuş ve yapılandırmacılığın epistemolojisinin rölativist ve anti-realist olduğunu göstermiştir. Benzer şekilde Muğaloğlu (2017) yılında Türkçe olarak basılan bir kitap bölümünde bu sorunlara bilim eğitimi çerçevesinde açıklık getirmiştir.…”
Section: Teorik çErçeveunclassified