1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf00454735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The problem of stabilization after sacrectomy

Abstract: After sacrectomy, mobilization of the patient is only possible if a stable connection between the spine and pelvis can be obtained. We have developed an instrumentation to fix the pelvis to the spine. Two DHS screws connected to each other were implanted in the pelvis (one DHS screw into each ilium). An internal spine fixator, anchored in L3 and L4 through transpedicular Schanz screws, was attached to these DHS screws. Two patients were stabilized with this implant after sacrectomy. One patient was able to wal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4,16,18,22 We have previously described a modified Galveston L-rod technique. 8,10 In this reconstruction technique a bilateral liaison is created between the lumbar spine and the pelvis by placing bilateral PSs at L3-5 and L-shaped-bent rods, attached to the screws, embedded into the ilia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,16,18,22 We have previously described a modified Galveston L-rod technique. 8,10 In this reconstruction technique a bilateral liaison is created between the lumbar spine and the pelvis by placing bilateral PSs at L3-5 and L-shaped-bent rods, attached to the screws, embedded into the ilia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have shown that pelvic stability is maintained if at least half the sacroiliac joint 16 and half the first sacral body 29,30 are preserved. In our patient, we preserved the sacroiliac joint and most of the sacrum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The location of the tumor within the sacrum determines whether a partial or total sacrectomy will be necessary to achieve a radical excision. Whereas subtotal resection of the sacrum caudal to midportion of the S1 vertebral body (VB) does not destabilize the pelvis, total sacrectomy requires establishment of a bilateral union between the lumbar spine and the ilium, as well as a reconstruction of the pelvic ring (2,5). Although the anterior approach is strongly recommended for sacral chordoma tumors, the posterior approach is adequate for total resection using retrorectal fat tissue as a cleavage line between tumor and rectum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%