While there is a literature on public and stakeholder engagement in environmental research and scenario development, less attention has been given to the learning processes that take place in these contexts. We present public perceptions of emissions contraction scenarios for the UK city of Manchester and discuss this in terms of learning theory developed by Lev Vygotsky and Jerome Bruner. A key theme of this is the combination of three learning tools of use in social and individual learning: scaffolding techniques, scenario building and backcasting. We discuss the ways in which our structured scenario-building process, employing Greenhouse Gas Regional Inventory Protocol (GRIP) backcasting software, bring together these components. Following Bruner, learners are treated as scientific reasoners, but with the acknowledgement that there are also important affective and other dimensions to learning.
Highlights We reflect on the learning processes of energy scenario participants GRIP energy-emissions backcasting software was used with 4 groups of the public The process required envisaging strong CO 2 reduction scenarios for a city region Key to the theory is Vygotsky's concept of scaffolding, developed by Bruner
AbstractWhile there is a literature on public and stakeholder engagement in environmental research and scenario development, less attention has been given to the learning processes that take place in these contexts. We present public perceptions of emissions contraction scenarios for the UK city of Manchester and discuss this in terms of learning theory developed by Lev Vygotsky and Jerome Bruner. A key theme of this is the combination of three learning tools of use in social and individual learning: scaffolding techniques, scenario building and backcasting. We discuss the ways in which our structured scenario-building process, employing Greenhouse Gas Regional Inventory Protocol (GRIP) backcasting software, bring together these components. Following Bruner, learners are treated as scientific reasoners, but with the acknowledgement that there are also important affective and other dimensions to learning.