2018
DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.08.102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The problem with sublobar resections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We appreciate the commentary brought by Cao and colleagues. Principally, they highlight several limitations associated with the use of a large national database (2). The extent of analysis that can be performed using a large database is limited by the granularity of the data and the sample size afforded after stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria are applied.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We appreciate the commentary brought by Cao and colleagues. Principally, they highlight several limitations associated with the use of a large national database (2). The extent of analysis that can be performed using a large database is limited by the granularity of the data and the sample size afforded after stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria are applied.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not only do they capture a diverse patient population representative of NSCLC in the United States, they include patients from hospitals of varying volume and specialization. While Cao and colleagues note that advances in histologic subtyping and examination of spread through air spaces (STAS) can provide important adjuncts to determination of extent of resection, there remains insufficient evidence that these techniques have been adopted routinely in the majority of practices (2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%