2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11077-008-9063-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The problem with the “portfolio approach” in American energy policy

Abstract: Energy policy, Renewable energy, Energy efficiency, Nuclear power, Clean coal, Fossil fuels,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When different intermittent energy sources are combined with each other or over large geographical regions, they are much less intermittent than at one location [13,17]. Nevertheless a quantitative characterization of different sources is a difficult task, the design of an optimal "energy portfolio" is far from being solved [17,18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When different intermittent energy sources are combined with each other or over large geographical regions, they are much less intermittent than at one location [13,17]. Nevertheless a quantitative characterization of different sources is a difficult task, the design of an optimal "energy portfolio" is far from being solved [17,18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These taxonomies provided analysts a framework for describing and assessing the ways in which governments connect policy goals and means in their effort to improve outcomes which over time have fostered the emergence of a 'tools approach' to understanding problems (Hood, 2007). Recent research has focused not only on choice of individual tools but also how they are assembled together as 'policy mixes' or 'portfolios' to maximise complementarities amongst and between tools (Borras and Edquist, 2013; Flanagan, Uyarra, & Laranja, 2011;Howlett & Del Rio, 2015;Mohnen and Roller, 2005;Schaffrin, Sewerin, & Seubert, 2014;Sovacool, 2008); issues relating to policy coordination (Jordan & Lenschow, 2010;Peters, 2015Peters, , 2018; policy coherence and consistency of these mixes (Howlett & Rayner, 2007;Kivimaa and Virkamaki, 2014;Rogge & Reichardt, 2016); how they are sequenced and layered (Howlett, 2019); the 'intensity', and explicitness with which they affect change (Thomann, 2018;Howlett, 2018) and criteria to evaluate them (Howlett, Capano, & Ramesh, 2018;Capano & Woo, 2018;Mukherjee & Howlett, 2018;del Rio, 2018;Bali, Capano and Ramesh, Forthcoming). These studies go beyond describing broad institutional choices used to organise a sector or policy styles and implementation preferences of governments (Bemelmans-Videc, 1998;Hood, 1983;Linder & Peters, 1989;Salamon, 2002;Trebilcock et al, 1982).…”
Section: Policy Tools Mixes and Their Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Encouraging demand-side management and energy efficiency can reduce peak congestion on electric power grids but would directly cut into the profitability of building natural gas peaking plants (Sovacool 2008). Energy taxes can promote efficiency and minimize waste, but also disfavor energy producers, especially Western and Gulf producers of oil and gas and global suppliers of coal (Kalicki and Goldwyn 2005).…”
Section: E Trade-offs and Complexitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%