2021
DOI: 10.1080/00438243.2021.1965015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The process of complex societies: dynamic models beyond site-size hierarchies

Abstract: The site-size hierarchy concept enables researchers to transform archaeological survey data into political classifications. Yet everything about the site-size rubric is worth re-thinking, from the reliability of surface-survey data to the recognition that sites of all sizes act autonomously within territorial configurations. New ways can visualize and analyze the process whereby complex societies (chiefdoms and states) emerge through the materialized energies of constituent parts (cities, towns, resource zones… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In archeological research, methods have been developed for imputing the relative importance of individual settlements to political and economic development. Initially, those methods were based on estimating population size (Duffy 2015), but it is now widely accepted that a focus on size alone is insufficient (Smith 2021). Size is an indicator of the level of human activity in a location, but not necessarily of how that location fits into the broader settlement landscape (Quinn & Ciugudean 2018).…”
Section: Central Places and Rural Settlement Hierarchiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In archeological research, methods have been developed for imputing the relative importance of individual settlements to political and economic development. Initially, those methods were based on estimating population size (Duffy 2015), but it is now widely accepted that a focus on size alone is insufficient (Smith 2021). Size is an indicator of the level of human activity in a location, but not necessarily of how that location fits into the broader settlement landscape (Quinn & Ciugudean 2018).…”
Section: Central Places and Rural Settlement Hierarchiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quinn and Barrier (2014) further emphasise the importance of legacy in that some places may retain certain reputations, resources and power irrespective of growth or decline in population size because of functions they performed in the past. This might be because of legacy infrastructure (like a significant church building) or social ties -where people with power retain links with smaller villages that they or their families once occupied (Smith 2021).…”
Section: Central Places and Rural Settlement Hierarchiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We suggest that these differing viewpoints can be reconciled if we approach urbanization and political centralization as dynamic, ongoing processes of assemblage creation rather than singular events (Crellin 2020). City and state are not fixed entities (Leadbetter 2021;M.L. Smith 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…City and state are not fixed entities (Leadbetter 2021; M.L. Smith 2021).
Figure 1.Map showing the approximate extent of Wari and Wari-influenced artifacts, as well as the location of some of the sites mentioned in the text.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%