Abstract:Emotional regulation is a developmental skill that everyone must learn. It is the ability for you to tune into, make sense of and control your own strong feelings. It affectively influences how well you can adapt to situations and events in your life, as well as how you navigate and adapt to the world. A lack of healthy emotional regulation can lead one to become dysregulated. Two important phenomenon underpin our ability to regulate: emotional complexity and splitting. The more acknowledgment and understandin… Show more
“…Emotional regulation is defined as a set of processes by which a person tries to influence what emotions they will experience and express, at what time and in what way [5,7]. It enables a person to adjust the expression of their own emotions to the demands of the environment, as well as to protect, restrain and direct unpleasant emotions to avoid interference with personal functioning [8].…”
Section: Emotional Regulation and Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Pennebaker [5], the inhibition of emotions is potentially unhealthy because it serves as a cumulative stress stimulus and prevents cognitive-affective assimilation processes. Not assimilated stressful events remain in the person's consciousness as unwanted and repetitive (ruminating) thoughts.…”
Section: Correlation Between Experienced Stress and Ability Of Emotio...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not assimilated stressful events remain in the person's consciousness as unwanted and repetitive (ruminating) thoughts. According to the Zeigarnik effect, people tend to remember unfinished tasks [5], hence unassimilated stressful events are more likely to remain in consciousness and provoke such thoughts. Studies also confirm that ruminating about stressful events leads to negative emotions and cognitive and behavioral avoidance of the cause of stressful episodes [5].…”
Section: Correlation Between Experienced Stress and Ability Of Emotio...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, exposure to public criticism and lawsuits and the impact of shift work are more stressful for men [2]. Additionally, there is a growing number of studies that confirm the fact that workplace stressors have an impact on the ability of emotional regulation and control in healthcare professionals [1,[4][5][6].…”
Emotional Regulation and Control implies a person’s ability to respond to stressful demands and emotional experiences in a socially acceptable and adaptive way. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to examine the contribution of the ability of emotional regulation and control in the prediction of workplace stress in healthcare professionals. The study included 203 healthcare professionals employed at a hospital in the Republic of Croatia. Data were collected using two validated questionnaires: Questionnaire on Workplace Stressors for Hospital Professionals and Emotional Regulation and Control Questionnaire (ERC). Most respondents (64%) experienced stress in Workplace Organization and Financial Issues factor, while 52.7% experienced stress in Public Criticism factor. The respondents assessed their ability of emotional regulation and control to be low (mean = 55; range = 20–100). The level of experienced stress was significantly higher if the ability of emotional regulation and control was low (Spearman’s Rho = 0.308; p < 0.001). The multivariate regression model (11.2% explained variances; p = 0.001) indicated a greater possibility of severe stress in respondents who have stronger Memory of Emotionally Saturated Content (odds ratio = 1.18; 95% CI = 1.07–1.30). The results of this study signify the need to establish effective institutional support aimed at objectifying stress and strengthening emotional intelligence and empathy in healthcare professionals.
“…Emotional regulation is defined as a set of processes by which a person tries to influence what emotions they will experience and express, at what time and in what way [5,7]. It enables a person to adjust the expression of their own emotions to the demands of the environment, as well as to protect, restrain and direct unpleasant emotions to avoid interference with personal functioning [8].…”
Section: Emotional Regulation and Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Pennebaker [5], the inhibition of emotions is potentially unhealthy because it serves as a cumulative stress stimulus and prevents cognitive-affective assimilation processes. Not assimilated stressful events remain in the person's consciousness as unwanted and repetitive (ruminating) thoughts.…”
Section: Correlation Between Experienced Stress and Ability Of Emotio...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not assimilated stressful events remain in the person's consciousness as unwanted and repetitive (ruminating) thoughts. According to the Zeigarnik effect, people tend to remember unfinished tasks [5], hence unassimilated stressful events are more likely to remain in consciousness and provoke such thoughts. Studies also confirm that ruminating about stressful events leads to negative emotions and cognitive and behavioral avoidance of the cause of stressful episodes [5].…”
Section: Correlation Between Experienced Stress and Ability Of Emotio...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, exposure to public criticism and lawsuits and the impact of shift work are more stressful for men [2]. Additionally, there is a growing number of studies that confirm the fact that workplace stressors have an impact on the ability of emotional regulation and control in healthcare professionals [1,[4][5][6].…”
Emotional Regulation and Control implies a person’s ability to respond to stressful demands and emotional experiences in a socially acceptable and adaptive way. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to examine the contribution of the ability of emotional regulation and control in the prediction of workplace stress in healthcare professionals. The study included 203 healthcare professionals employed at a hospital in the Republic of Croatia. Data were collected using two validated questionnaires: Questionnaire on Workplace Stressors for Hospital Professionals and Emotional Regulation and Control Questionnaire (ERC). Most respondents (64%) experienced stress in Workplace Organization and Financial Issues factor, while 52.7% experienced stress in Public Criticism factor. The respondents assessed their ability of emotional regulation and control to be low (mean = 55; range = 20–100). The level of experienced stress was significantly higher if the ability of emotional regulation and control was low (Spearman’s Rho = 0.308; p < 0.001). The multivariate regression model (11.2% explained variances; p = 0.001) indicated a greater possibility of severe stress in respondents who have stronger Memory of Emotionally Saturated Content (odds ratio = 1.18; 95% CI = 1.07–1.30). The results of this study signify the need to establish effective institutional support aimed at objectifying stress and strengthening emotional intelligence and empathy in healthcare professionals.
“…It is indeed important that we are able to understand and name our feelings. It can then help us manage our emotions, and achieve long-term well-being (Madden et al, 2021). The revelation of Languishing thus came as a relief to many of us.…”
Since 2021 there has been an increased interest in languishing in the popular media. Though well-intentioned, the misinterpretation of the two continua model of mental health and mental illness that has happened through these popular articles and media content are bad for science. This article outlines the widespread misinterpretation of the two continua model. It also presents the basics of the two continua model as proposed by Tudor and the terms of languishing and flourishing as presented by Keyes. It also discusses the status of evidence supporting the two continua model.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.