2016
DOI: 10.1017/jmo.2016.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The process of industry exit in the Japanese context: Evidence from the flat panel display industry

Abstract: This research studies industry exit in the Japanese context, by examining the process followed five Japanese flat panel display manufacturers as they de-committed to and later exited from the industry. The five cases examine firms with systematically different exit barriers due to the presence or absence of strategic centrality and vertical integration in each firm. With one exception, all the firms followed multi-staged exit processes involving cooperative arrangements with other industry participants. Firms … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We decided to study Japan-based firms for two primary reasons. First, institutional and cultural differences between Japanese and Americans have been well documented (e.g., Dore, 1973; Yoshimura & Anderson, 1997; Lehmberg, 2017), thus enhancing broader generalizability of the findings. Second, Japan is endowed with a developed economy and regulatory system, which requires publicly traded firms to provide publicly available documentation generally comparable to that required by US-based firms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We decided to study Japan-based firms for two primary reasons. First, institutional and cultural differences between Japanese and Americans have been well documented (e.g., Dore, 1973; Yoshimura & Anderson, 1997; Lehmberg, 2017), thus enhancing broader generalizability of the findings. Second, Japan is endowed with a developed economy and regulatory system, which requires publicly traded firms to provide publicly available documentation generally comparable to that required by US-based firms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection of cases relies on the concept of theoretical sampling (Eisenhardt & Graebner, 2007), so that they presented theoretically relevant differences and thus provided insight on commonalities and differences across them (Lehmberg, 2017). As a basic criterion, all the cases should be established firms operating in the Spanish region of Navarre and engaged in collaborative innovation processes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noteworthy, most of these studies utilize emerging markets to look at empirical evidence for their arguments. Finally, two articles analyse the role of dynamic capabilities in different lifecycle stages and their performance implications (Lehmberg, 2017;Zhou, Zhou, Feng, & Jiang, 2017).…”
Section: E D I T O R I a Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The case of disinvestment or even exit from industries is rarely discussed, particularly in relation to dynamic capabilities. Lehmberg (2017) adds a most interesting study of five Japanese flat panel display manufacturers that eventually exit the industry. While industry exits may seemingly be similar processes, Lehmberg shows that the five manufacturers faced fundamentally different barriers for their exits depending on their strategic positioning, network position, and commitment to the industry.…”
Section: Network and Slackmentioning
confidence: 99%