The Psychology of Music 2013
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-381460-9.00007-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Processing of Pitch Combinations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 173 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the model considered up to now, performance is limited by a noisy encoding of the elements of C, but not T. This was an appropriate model for the main experiment of Demany and Ramos (2005), in which the elements of C were always synchronous-a circumstance propitious to informational masking-and T was presented after C. In the current experiment, however, the elements of C were not always synchronous and T was presented before C. Since the memory trace of a tone can be strongly affected by the presentation of subsequent tones (Deutsch, 1972(Deutsch, , 1999, it is reasonable to assume that T had a more noisy internal representation than the elements of C when these elements were asynchronous and successively compared to T. This led us to consider an ideal listener ⌳' behaving exactly like ⌳ but hampered by noise in the encoding of T alone, not the elements of C. For the five values of previously selected, the results of ⌳' in the two tasks are plotted as diamonds in Figure 2. It can be seen that the relation between performance in the two tasks is rather similar for ⌳ and ⌳'.…”
Section: Two Mechanisms Of Auditory Change Detectionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the model considered up to now, performance is limited by a noisy encoding of the elements of C, but not T. This was an appropriate model for the main experiment of Demany and Ramos (2005), in which the elements of C were always synchronous-a circumstance propitious to informational masking-and T was presented after C. In the current experiment, however, the elements of C were not always synchronous and T was presented before C. Since the memory trace of a tone can be strongly affected by the presentation of subsequent tones (Deutsch, 1972(Deutsch, , 1999, it is reasonable to assume that T had a more noisy internal representation than the elements of C when these elements were asynchronous and successively compared to T. This led us to consider an ideal listener ⌳' behaving exactly like ⌳ but hampered by noise in the encoding of T alone, not the elements of C. For the five values of previously selected, the results of ⌳' in the two tasks are plotted as diamonds in Figure 2. It can be seen that the relation between performance in the two tasks is rather similar for ⌳ and ⌳'.…”
Section: Two Mechanisms Of Auditory Change Detectionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As for half-octave pitch shifts, listeners are on average equally likely to report upward or downward pitch shifts (Shepard, 1964). This effect appears to be subject to strong idiosyncratic biases, which itself has become the subject of a large body of work (e.g., Deutsch, 2013;Repp, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the present metaphoric representation of the Western pitch space in terms of verticality, originating in Medieval Latin, is still the dominant mode of musical pitch conceptualization (Deutsch 2013;Park 2015), there are many languages that use other metaphors to refer to pitch relations. In some languages there is a metonymic connection between the process of music performance and the instruments used, which results in the attribution of small and large to the pitches typical of the musical practice.…”
Section: čLanci -Articles -Artikelmentioning
confidence: 99%