1999
DOI: 10.1006/jasc.1998.0322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Production and Preservation of Faecal Spherulites: Animals, Environment and Taphonomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
104
1
7

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
104
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the more reliable means of identifying a dung signature in sediments is through the study of spherulites, fibrous crystalline aggregates of calcium carbonate from the guts of ungulates (Brochier et al 1992;Canti 1997Canti , 1999Shahack-Gross and Finkelstein 2008;Lancelotti and Madella 2012). Studies of spherulites can provide a direct indication of dung, and they have been identified at the early farming site of Jeitun in Turkmenistan (Canti 1997).…”
Section: The Archaeology Of Dungmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the more reliable means of identifying a dung signature in sediments is through the study of spherulites, fibrous crystalline aggregates of calcium carbonate from the guts of ungulates (Brochier et al 1992;Canti 1997Canti , 1999Shahack-Gross and Finkelstein 2008;Lancelotti and Madella 2012). Studies of spherulites can provide a direct indication of dung, and they have been identified at the early farming site of Jeitun in Turkmenistan (Canti 1997).…”
Section: The Archaeology Of Dungmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spherolites are calcite particles produced in the stomach of some ruminants. They are abundant in faeces, and their concentration in archaeological sediments, linked with the accumulation of excrements, is usually interpreted as sheep/goat penning (Brochier, 1996;Canti, 1999). Archaeozoological data, such as the presence of shed milk teeth or the age-at-death profiles, can also support this interpretation (Helmer, 1984;Helmer et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studying the formation histories of the dung deposits and their archaeological identification and significance Macphail and Goldberg (1985), Canti (1998), Canti (1999 Charles (1998), Charles et al (1998), Forbes (1998), Jones (1998), Valamoti (2013) Secondary product use -dung as building material and source of fuel Watson (1979), Kramer (1982), Miller and Smart (1984), Miller (1996), Matthews et al (1997), Anderson and Ertug-Yaras (1998), Reddy (1999), Sillar (1999), Matthews (2008) results, and there is much scepticism over analytical performance (Frahm 2013;Frahm and Doonan 2013). Inter-instrument performance of pXRF equipment has proved that between different instruments statistically identical results are not produced (Goodale et al 2012).…”
Section: Archaeological Dung Research Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%