1934
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-8707(34)90245-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The production in the rabbit of hypersensitive reactions to lens, rabbit muscle and low ragweed extracts by the action of staphylococcus toxin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1935
1935
1966
1966

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results of this study (Table VII) of this micoorganism with other altered states of mammalian tissue reactivity (18,19). It is also relevant to recent reports of in vitro (20) and in vivo (21) cross-reactions between streptococcal and staphylococcal antigens.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Results of this study (Table VII) of this micoorganism with other altered states of mammalian tissue reactivity (18,19). It is also relevant to recent reports of in vitro (20) and in vivo (21) cross-reactions between streptococcal and staphylococcal antigens.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The effect of bacterial components on antibody response to antigenic stimulus has received less attention. Staphylotoxin has been reported to raise the level of antibody developed in response to weakly antigenic substances such as ragweed pollen and crystalline beef lens, when administered combined with, or several hours prior to these antigens (8,9). This synergistic action of staphylotoxin has been used to advantage by Hecht et al in producing specific antiskin antibodies in rabbits (10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This observation may be pertinent to the association of staphylococci with other states of altered mamma lian tissue reactivity [7,4]. It may represent an additional instance of the in vitro [8] and in vivo [6] cross-reactions described between streptococcal and staphylococcal antigenic components.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%