2011
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2028701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Production of Legitimacy in New Zealand Local Government Auditing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sargiacomo and Gomes (, p. 253) and Gomes and Sargiacomo (, p. 439) also called attention to the existence of ‘vast archives’ of public records. Modern Westminster‐based democracies (including Britain, Australia, New Zealand and Canada) have public sector audit functions based on those established in Britain during the seventeenth, eighteenth and nineteenth centuries (Baker & Rennie, ; Colquhoun, ; Di Francesco, ; Funnell, and ; Funnell et al., ). This recognition is somewhat complicated by the observation that the final maturation of the Westminster parliamentary system of Imperial Britain occurred concomitantly with the development of various colonial constitutional arrangements rather than before them (Gilchrist & Coulson, ).…”
Section: Theme I: Gap Identification and Rationalisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sargiacomo and Gomes (, p. 253) and Gomes and Sargiacomo (, p. 439) also called attention to the existence of ‘vast archives’ of public records. Modern Westminster‐based democracies (including Britain, Australia, New Zealand and Canada) have public sector audit functions based on those established in Britain during the seventeenth, eighteenth and nineteenth centuries (Baker & Rennie, ; Colquhoun, ; Di Francesco, ; Funnell, and ; Funnell et al., ). This recognition is somewhat complicated by the observation that the final maturation of the Westminster parliamentary system of Imperial Britain occurred concomitantly with the development of various colonial constitutional arrangements rather than before them (Gilchrist & Coulson, ).…”
Section: Theme I: Gap Identification and Rationalisationmentioning
confidence: 99%