The Production of Nominal Compounds in Aphasia

Blanken, Gerhard

doi:10.1006/brln.2000.2338

Cited by 42 publications

(41 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…That is, a full-listing account (e.g. Butterworth 1983) is incompatible whereas full-parsing and dual-route models are compatible with the present data (Badecker 2001;Bien et al 2005;Blanken 2000;Levelt et al 1999;Stemberger and MacWhinney 1986;Taft 2004). …”

Section: Processing Of Complex Wordssupporting

confidence: 43%

“…errors such as constituent substitutions decreased with decreasing transparency and increasing frequency of the constituting morphemes (Blanken 2000;see also Badecker 2001;Hittmair-Delazer et al 1994; but see Bi et al 2007). Furthermore, some dysgraphic patients show morphological boundary effects in their spelling behaviour (Schiller et al 2001).…”

Section: Representation Of Complex Wordsmentioning

confidence: 86%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Accessing Words from the Mental Lexicon

Schiller¹,

Verdonschot²

2014

Oxford Handbooks Online

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Processing Of Complex Wordssupporting

confidence: 43%

Section: Representation Of Complex Wordsmentioning

confidence: 86%

Accessing Words from the Mental Lexicon

Schiller¹,

Verdonschot²

2014

Oxford Handbooks Online

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Morphologically complex words, at least compounds, seem not to be stored and prepared as whole-word forms. That is, a full-listing account (e.g., Butterworth, 1983) is incompatible whereas full-parsing and dual-route models are compatible with the present data (Badecker, 2001;Bien et al, 2005;Blanken, 2000;Levelt et al, 1999;Stemberger and MacWhinney, 1986;Taft, 2004).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 45%

“…Misproductions were found to be morpheme-based, i.e. errors such as constituent substitutions decreased with decreasing transparency and increasing frequency of the constituents (Blanken, 2000; see also Badecker, 2001;HittmairDelazer et al, 1994;but Bi et al, 2007).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Morphological priming in overt language production: Electrophysiological evidence from Dutch

2008

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

a b s t r a c t a r t i c l e i n f oThe present study investigated morphological priming in Dutch and its time course in overt speech production using a long-lag priming paradigm. Prime words were compounds that were morphologically related to a picture name (e.g. the word jaszak, 'coat pocket' was used for a picture of a coat; Dutch jas) or form-related monomorphemic words (e.g. jasmijn, 'jasmine'). The morphologically related compounds could be semantically transparent (e.g. eksternest, 'magpie nest') or opaque (e.g. eksteroog, lit. 'magpie eye', 'corn', for a picture of a magpie, Dutch ekster). Behavioral and event-related potential (ERP) data were collected in two sessions. The production of morphologically related and complex words facilitated subsequent picture naming and elicited a reduced N400 compared with unrelated prime words. The effects did not differ for transparent and opaque relations. Mere form overlap between a prime word and a target picture name did not affect picture naming. These results extend previous findings from German to another language and demonstrate the feasibility of measuring cognitive ERP components during overt speech. Furthermore, the results suggest that morphological priming in language production cannot be reduced to semantic and phonological processing. The time course of these priming effects as reflected in the ERP measure is in accordance with a meta-analytic temporal estimate of morphological encoding in speaking [Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W.J.M. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92, suggesting that morphological relations are encoded at the word form level.

show abstract

“…Moreover, we investigate a broader spectrum of linguistic phenomena, namely aspect (comparison between perfectifs and secondary imperfectifs) and root status in addition to semantic transparency. Neurolinguistic studies have investigated the issue of semantic transparency in compounds (Blanken, 2000;Libben, 1998). The patient of Libben (1998) did not recognize the majority of the compounds tested and tended to treat them as novel forms, i.e.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%