2013
DOI: 10.1068/d13111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Production of Space: A Neglected Perspective in Pastoral Research

Abstract: This paper off ers an overview of the dispersed elements of social spatiality present in the rich work about pastoralists and their space, and brings them together under the conceptual framework of Lefebvre's production of space. The three facets of pastorally produced space are outlined: 'perceived space', low-intensity spatial footprints linked by seasonal migratory trails; 'conceived space', social territoriality and agrarian socialism; and 'lived space', ideologies of spatial attachment that transcend a pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Collectively, these geographical insights into the energy-society relationship provide examples of all three facets -as described in Karplus and Meir (2013) -of what Lefebvre has called the 'production of space' (Lefebvre, 1991). Social value systems related to the non-human world re-position physical entities as energy resources and at the same time establish the legal and extra-legal institutions through which resource access and spatial planning are enforced (conceived space).…”
Section: Energy Space Societymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Collectively, these geographical insights into the energy-society relationship provide examples of all three facets -as described in Karplus and Meir (2013) -of what Lefebvre has called the 'production of space' (Lefebvre, 1991). Social value systems related to the non-human world re-position physical entities as energy resources and at the same time establish the legal and extra-legal institutions through which resource access and spatial planning are enforced (conceived space).…”
Section: Energy Space Societymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Indeed, from a cultural perspective, as shown above (see also Castree, ; Hewson, ; Howitt et al, ; Porter, ) the geographies of these groups are fundamentally contrasting with Western ones, and group members seek control over their PoS. This implies, as suggested by (Karplus, ; also Karplus & Meir, ), an “endogenic PoS”, as against the “exogenic” production of the grand space by the hegemonic sectors. As state and market powers desire spatial homogeneity and smoothness of society–space relationships at a macro scale (see also Howitt, ), the endogenic PoS is often unrecognised by the hegemony and is viewed as informal (Roy & AlSayyad, ).…”
Section: Proposed Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The study spans almost two centuries. Methodologically, it is based on fieldwork (Karplus, ) whose primary findings were already published (Karplus & Meir, , ) and its insights serve now as raw data in our analysis here. Due to the limited scope, these data are presented only in a summary tabular format.…”
Section: Proposed Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We specified a model formulating the relations between a set of parameters we discussed in the previous section. This model presents our assumptions about the spatial occupation of grazing areas and is based on Karplus and Meir's [41] concept of pastoral spatiality developed under the Lefebvre [42] framework for the production of space. Lefebvre's [42] spatial framework conceptualizes space as a triad consisting of perceived, conceived, and lived spaces interrelated to each other.…”
Section: Modeling and Hypothesizing The Spatial Occupation Of Grazingmentioning
confidence: 99%