2006
DOI: 10.1086/499547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Productivity Effects of Privatization: Longitudinal Estimates from Hungary, Romania, Russia, and Ukraine

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
139
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 236 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
10
139
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…16 Our sample of 45,275 firms is the largest dataset on Russian firms ever considered. By comparison, in Brown, Earle, and Telegdy (2006) 14,620 firms in Russia are considered as a near-population sample of large industrial firms.…”
Section: The Political Cycle In Tunnelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Our sample of 45,275 firms is the largest dataset on Russian firms ever considered. By comparison, in Brown, Earle, and Telegdy (2006) 14,620 firms in Russia are considered as a near-population sample of large industrial firms.…”
Section: The Political Cycle In Tunnelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brown et al (2006) also consider privatization, here that of manufacturing firms in four excommunist countries. Their basic OLS results suggest that privatization raised productivity in all four countries.…”
Section: Public-and Private-sector Employmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the policymaking standpoint, the overall lack of empirical studies on the post-socialist judiciaries is worrisome since by year 2005, in transition countries "less overall progress [had] been made in judicial reform and strengthening than in almost any other area of policy or institutional reform" (Anderson et al 2005: 57). At the same time, the relative dearth of empirical analyses of the functioning of courts in the post-socialist 2 region stands in stark contrast with the voluminous body of empirical research on firm behavior in transition (see, e.g., Djankov and Murrell 2002, Brown et al 2006, Murrell 2005.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%