2014
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2428177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Productivity Puzzle: A Firm-Level Investigation into Employment Behaviour and Resource Allocation Over the Crisis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, it seems the industry is evolving towards a dual structure where the largest banks (in terms of services they provide and number of customers they serve) are unable to catch-up with the best performers in the industry while being surrounded by smaller institutions which may experience positive productivity growth but whose technological capabilities to compete with the best performing banks is limited. These results are consistent with the findings of the Bank of England (Barnett et al, 2014) and of the UK Treasury (HM Treasury, 2015). The Bank of England has found that productivity in the sector has fallen considerably following the financial crisis 18 ; at the same time, our results concur with the view of the UK Treasury suggesting that the financial crisis has altered the nature of competition in the banking sector as concentration in the sector has increased with the result that the sector will evolve towards a market structure where a small number of large institutions will dominate the industry.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As a result, it seems the industry is evolving towards a dual structure where the largest banks (in terms of services they provide and number of customers they serve) are unable to catch-up with the best performers in the industry while being surrounded by smaller institutions which may experience positive productivity growth but whose technological capabilities to compete with the best performing banks is limited. These results are consistent with the findings of the Bank of England (Barnett et al, 2014) and of the UK Treasury (HM Treasury, 2015). The Bank of England has found that productivity in the sector has fallen considerably following the financial crisis 18 ; at the same time, our results concur with the view of the UK Treasury suggesting that the financial crisis has altered the nature of competition in the banking sector as concentration in the sector has increased with the result that the sector will evolve towards a market structure where a small number of large institutions will dominate the industry.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…But for the U.K., resource slack had sharply diminished well before this writing. Barnett et al (2014) and Haskel et al (2015) discuss a range of alternative explanations but conclude that much remains unexplained.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons behind this productivity puzzle are numerous: falling productivity in the oil and gas and financial sectors; weak investments reducing the quality of equipment; the banking crisis generating lack of lending to more productive firms; employees being moved to less productive roles within the firm; and slowing rates of innovation and discovery, as well as population ageing. However, these factors are not sufficient on their own to entirely explain the phenomenon (Barnett et al 2014, Harari 2017. The GDP growth realised in the past few years is mainly attributable to the increase in the hours worked (that is, increasing employment and decreasing unemployment) rather than productivity growth, which means that the labour market performance has been relatively strong during and after the crisis.…”
Section: The Impacts Of the Global Financial Crisismentioning
confidence: 99%