2019
DOI: 10.52306/0201041yngg5534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The profile of the international cyber offender in the U.S.

Abstract: This study explores the characteristics of international cyber offenders prosecuted in the U.S. Our findings to a large extent correspond with general studies about cyber offenders with a few important exceptions. First, the average age of the offenders in our study is slightly higher than others that do not focus exclusively on international offenders. Second, while this research confirms that China is among the leading country in committing cybercrimes when it comes to committing particular types of cybercri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies focus on the tactics and technologies used for identity protection (Balfe, 2014; Stewart, 2014) and are less significant from the point of view of legal researchers. There are studies showing reflections on the human psychology, intrapersonal characteristics of the offenders (Hadzhidimova & Payne, 2019) studying the causes and reasons behind the youths’/adolescents’ committing crimes, online internet addiction and the associated risk factors (Hahn & Kim, 2014; Henn, 2013; Menon et al, 2018). Most of the studies also focus on child pornography and sexual abuse, its varied dimensions, awareness and impact on individual, family and culture (Mitchell & Jones 2013; UNODC, 2015; Wolak et al, 2014), and the social and psychological impact of cyberattacks (Bada & Jason, 2020) and do significantly contribute towards the need for regulating the usage of online media.…”
Section: Aim and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies focus on the tactics and technologies used for identity protection (Balfe, 2014; Stewart, 2014) and are less significant from the point of view of legal researchers. There are studies showing reflections on the human psychology, intrapersonal characteristics of the offenders (Hadzhidimova & Payne, 2019) studying the causes and reasons behind the youths’/adolescents’ committing crimes, online internet addiction and the associated risk factors (Hahn & Kim, 2014; Henn, 2013; Menon et al, 2018). Most of the studies also focus on child pornography and sexual abuse, its varied dimensions, awareness and impact on individual, family and culture (Mitchell & Jones 2013; UNODC, 2015; Wolak et al, 2014), and the social and psychological impact of cyberattacks (Bada & Jason, 2020) and do significantly contribute towards the need for regulating the usage of online media.…”
Section: Aim and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of the articles mentioned in Table 1 focus on ICT knowledge or skills of offenders and judges. Hadzhidimova and Payne (2019) have analysed press releases from the U.S. Department of Justice about N = 225 cybercrime offenders who were not born in the US. Their main conclusion was that sentencing severity depends on the type of cybercrime.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%