2021
DOI: 10.1002/pd.5907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prognosis of common arterial trunk from a fetal perspective: A prenatal cohort study and systematic literature review

Abstract: Objective The limited number of large fetal cohort studies on common arterial trunk (CAT) impedes prenatal counseling at midgestation. This study evaluates the prognosis of CAT from a fetal perspective. Method Fetuses with a prenatally diagnosed CAT were extracted from the PRECOR registry (2002–2016). We evaluated fetal and postnatal survival and the presence of additional morbidity at last follow‐up. Literature databases were searches systematically for additional cases. Results Thirty‐eight cases with a pren… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(101 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, with advances in fetal echocardiography, there is an increasing frequency of inutero diagnosis of TA. [1][2][3][4] Prenatal diagnosis offers the bene ts of providing su cient time for parental counseling, making informed family planning decisions, completing multi-disciplinary delivery planning, and choosing an appropriate delivery location. Although TA outcomes after neonatal surgical repair have been well described with improved survival in the current era [1,[5][6][7], the fetal and neonatal outcomes prior to the surgical repair are not well characterized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, with advances in fetal echocardiography, there is an increasing frequency of inutero diagnosis of TA. [1][2][3][4] Prenatal diagnosis offers the bene ts of providing su cient time for parental counseling, making informed family planning decisions, completing multi-disciplinary delivery planning, and choosing an appropriate delivery location. Although TA outcomes after neonatal surgical repair have been well described with improved survival in the current era [1,[5][6][7], the fetal and neonatal outcomes prior to the surgical repair are not well characterized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1,2,8] A pre-surgical mortality rate higher than what would be expected in other congenital heart disease (CHD) has been suggested previously in small cohorts. [3,9] Despite this, due to the lack of data, prognostication and prenatal counseling of this rare CHD are often based on outcomes data following neonatal surgical repair. [1,5,[10][11][12][13] Moreover, previously published studies have reported up to 47% elective termination frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Common arterial trunk (CAT) is a rare congenital heart defect (CHD), accounting for about 1% of CHD foetuses. 1 CAT represents an early stage of the development of primitive arterial septum during embryonic development. Therefore, only one large artery leading from the bottom of the embryonic heart is preserved, and the ventricular blood is pumped into systemic circulation, pulmonary circulation and coronary circulation through a set of semilunar valves' instead.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding CAT's prognosis, its intrauterine course is relatively stable except for cases with a severe truncal valve insufficiency that can lead to fetal hydrops and intrauterine death [6]. Despite the great advances in neonatal cardiac surgery, CAT still has significant mortality with rates varying from 3 to 30% [7,8] and mostly depending on the perioperative situation as well as on the presence of associated anomalies. Some prenatal ultrasound markers have been proposed to identify fetuses at a higher risk of perinatal mortality such as truncal valve functional anomalies (mostly regurgitation but also stenosis), the presence of an IAA, or coronary anomalies [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%