2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03632-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prognostic importance of MRI detected extramural vascular invasion (mrEMVI) in locally advanced rectal cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Various studies demonstrate development of distant metastases in 6.7 to 23% mrEMVI negative cases compared with 24.5 to 55% in mrEMVI positive cases. 8 24 27 Our India-specific data shows a similar trend, with 26% mrEMVI negative and 41% mrEMVI positive developing distant metastases. The percentage of mrEMVI negative patients developing subsequent metastatic recurrence is slightly higher than other studies; the reasons for this could include the higher incidence of signet cell tumors in the Indian population and possible relatively advanced tumors at the time of presentation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various studies demonstrate development of distant metastases in 6.7 to 23% mrEMVI negative cases compared with 24.5 to 55% in mrEMVI positive cases. 8 24 27 Our India-specific data shows a similar trend, with 26% mrEMVI negative and 41% mrEMVI positive developing distant metastases. The percentage of mrEMVI negative patients developing subsequent metastatic recurrence is slightly higher than other studies; the reasons for this could include the higher incidence of signet cell tumors in the Indian population and possible relatively advanced tumors at the time of presentation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…There is mixed data with regards to correlation of mrEMVI with OS, with some studies not finding statistically significant correlation. 28,29 While others demonstrating significantly worsened survival in mrEMVI positive patients, 24,27 our study findings showed a 3-year OS of 82% for mrEMVI positive cases, which was lesser than the OS of 87% for mrEMVI negative patients, but not statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…In cases positive for MRI-EMVI, a short course of preoperative radiotherapy (SCPRT) or CRT is recommended, with the aim of reducing recurrence. Previous studies reveal correlations between MRI-EMVI and prognosis in terms of overall survival, RFS, and increased distant recurrence [ 7 , 9 , 12 , 34 , 35 ]. Smith et al [ 7 ] found significantly a worse 3-year RFS rate among patients positive for MRI-EMVI (35.0%) compared to patients negative for MRI-EMVI (74.1%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of the trials had been established to investigate the effect of mrEMVI on prognosis, but did report mrEMVI status as part of a multivariate analysis. After qualitative analysis, a consensus decision among authors (JT and RC) was made to exclude 13 articles owing to overlapping patient populations (n = 4), [23][24][25][26] high selection bias (n = 1), 27 high attrition bias (n = 3), [28][29][30] poor quality (n = 2), 31,32 no differentiation between baseline mrEMVI and post-treatment mrEMVI (n = 2), 14,15 and results not being comparable with other studies in the meta-analysis (n = 1). 33 Attrition bias was considered significant if median follow-up was short but 3-or 5-year survival outcomes were still reported.…”
Section: Qualitative Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%