2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prognostic role of mid-range ejection fraction in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A multicentre observational study showed a persistently impaired LVSD (ejection fraction less than 50%) in approximately 75% of patients who had LVSD after acute myocardial infarction [14]. Furthermore, LVSD secondary to CAD is associated with poor mortality and morbidity with a stepwise increase in the risk of malignant arrhythmia and heart failure proportionate to the reduction in ejection fraction [15,16]. Similar observations were evident in the ISCHEMIA trial and the primary endpoint of cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, hospitalization or cardiac arrest over 4 years was higher in patients with heart failure or LVSD (≤35%) in comparison to patients without heart failure symptoms or LVSD (22.7% versus 12.3%, respectively) [11].…”
Section: Significance Of Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction In Pat...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A multicentre observational study showed a persistently impaired LVSD (ejection fraction less than 50%) in approximately 75% of patients who had LVSD after acute myocardial infarction [14]. Furthermore, LVSD secondary to CAD is associated with poor mortality and morbidity with a stepwise increase in the risk of malignant arrhythmia and heart failure proportionate to the reduction in ejection fraction [15,16]. Similar observations were evident in the ISCHEMIA trial and the primary endpoint of cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, hospitalization or cardiac arrest over 4 years was higher in patients with heart failure or LVSD (≤35%) in comparison to patients without heart failure symptoms or LVSD (22.7% versus 12.3%, respectively) [11].…”
Section: Significance Of Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction In Pat...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are delighted to read the innovative article written by Alkhalil M and his colleagues examining mid-range ejection fraction (mrEF) in patients presented with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) [1] . Several critical issues should be further discussed to help the interpretation of the results.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, hypertension, hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, obesity, elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines, chronic kidney impairment, and other cardiometabolic risk factors seem to be linked with many of these processes, thus increasing the risk of vascular instability and atherosclerosis [ 2 , 5 , 6 , 9 ]. It is well documented that the ventricular systolic dysfunction during ACS is an important clinical manifestation leading to worse outcomes [ 10 12 ]. On the other hand, it is worth noting that left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), determined by echocardiography, could be applied to clarify left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%