The Promise of a Multi-Disciplinary, Mixed-Methods Approach to Inform Insect Pest Management: Evidence From Wyoming Alfalfa

Abstract

Pest management strategies involve a complex set of considerations, circumstances, and decision-making. Existing research suggests that farmers are reflexive and reflective in their management choices yet continue to employ curative rather than preventative strategies, and opt for chemical over biological solutions. In this piece, we detail work from a two-year, multidisciplinary, mixed-methods study of insect pest management strategies in alfalfa in Wyoming, integrating data from four focus groups, a statewide survey, and biological sampling of production fields. We outline how these different sources of data together contribute to a more complete understanding of the challenges and strategies employed by farmers, and specifically on biological pest control. We applied this approach across alfalfa hay and seed crop systems. Relatively few farmers acknowledged biological control in focus groups or surveys, yet biological exploration yielded abundant parasitism of common pest alfalfa weevil. On the other hand, parasitism of seed alfalfa pest Lygus was far less common and patchy across fields. It is only in integrating quantitative and qualitative, biological and social data that we are able to generate a more complete portrait of the challenges and opportunities of working with farmers to embrace a preventative paradigm. In doing so, we offer insights on possible barriers to the adoption of preventative insect management strategies and provide a case study of integrating social science and biophysical techniques to better understand opportunities to expand biological pest control in cropping systems.

Evaluation of reflective groundcovers for pest and fruit quality management in commercial pear orchards

“…We next tested reflective fabric and metallized film in commercial orchards by collaborating with pear orchardists, which allowed us to collect economic data, learn what factors affect whether orchardists adopt or reject reflective groundcovers and adapt study goals based on stakeholder interests. Collaborative on‐farm research has many advantages over top‐down expert‐to‐layperson knowledge transfer (Jabbour & Noy, 2020; Warner, 2008), and communication among farmers is an important way that knowledge spreads (Noy & Jabbour, 2020). Therefore, we thought that involving orchardists in research would help catalyse adoption and spread of reflective groundcovers if cooperators' experiences were positive.…”

“…In 2021, we interviewed the single cooperator following the same protocol as in 2020. The qualitative responses from both years were analysed separately by categorizing and summarizing themes presented by cooperators (Jabbour & Noy, 2020). We also obtained spray records for study sites.…”

Effects of Market Incentives and Livelihood Dependence on Farmers’ Multi-Stage Pesticide Application Behavior—A Case Study of Four Provinces in China

“…Internationally, these components are usually ranked at various levels, such as the green level which means the pesticide is safe and the blue label which means a pesticide has low-toxicity [ 87 ]. Green or low-toxicity pesticides are generally made from biological sources, tweaking natural hormones from plant sources, or low-hazard chemicals, either singly or mixed [ 88 , 89 ]. Typical green and low-toxic pesticides include Liuyangmycin, Abamectin, Methoxyabamectin, Mancozeb, Oxyfluorfen, and glyphosate.…”

Insecticide application timing effects on alfalfa insect communities

“…In Wyoming, grasshoppers can be occasionally problematic ( Jabbour and Noy 2017 ). Lygus bugs are primarily insect pests of alfalfa seed production due to their preferential feeding on flowers and young seeds but occur in forage systems ( Jabbour and Noy 2020 ). Lastly, clover root curculio Sitona hispidulus (Fab.)…”