2001
DOI: 10.1067/mpd.2001.114475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prone sleeping position impairs arousability in term infants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

8
80
1
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
8
80
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[5][6][7][8][9] Prone sleep may inhibit arm movements associated with a full extensor startle response, which would lead to less frequent behavioral arousal by reducing proprioceptive stimuli in the same way that may occur during swaddling. Decreased arousability has been implicated as a cause for SIDS in prone sleeping infants.…”
Section: Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[5][6][7][8][9] Prone sleep may inhibit arm movements associated with a full extensor startle response, which would lead to less frequent behavioral arousal by reducing proprioceptive stimuli in the same way that may occur during swaddling. Decreased arousability has been implicated as a cause for SIDS in prone sleeping infants.…”
Section: Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Studies confirm that the prone position decreases frequency of arousals. [5][6][7][8][9] Swaddled infants placed on their backs are said to "sleep better," presumably meaning that they sleep longer or with fewer arousals. Parents commonly report that infants who are back sleepers "startle themselves awake."…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2,16 Term infants sleeping prone have alterations in cardiovascular control, [17][18][19][20][21] and we have previously demonstrated that this is reflected in the cerebral circulation, expressed as reduced cerebral oxygenation and altered cerebrovascular control. 22,23 It has been suggested that reduced cerebral oxygenation may contribute to impaired arousal, 22 which is seen in the prone position in both term 18,24 and preterm infants [25][26][27] and is likely to be significant in the pathophysiology of SIDS. 10,28 Preterm infants display immature cerebrovascular control before termequivalent age, [29][30][31][32] the severity of which is related to their GA at birth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9 Several recent papers have shown that the response to an external stimulus (provoked arousal) is greater during supine (i.e., infants were more responsive) compared with prone sleeping position for preterm and term infants. [10][11][12][13] In this paper, we have studied spontaneous arousal during both prone and supine sleep and have carried out a secondary analysis in a subgroup of preterm infants in whom we reported the effect of sleep position on sleep organization, duration and heart rate variability at 1 and 3 months of age. 8 We hypothesized that the intervals between arousals would be longer, and the duration of the arousals shorter in prone vs supine position as has been previously reported by others during provoked arousals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%