1999
DOI: 10.2307/2586750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The proof-theoretic analysis of transfinitely iterated fixed point theories

Abstract: Abstract. This article provides the proof-theoretic analysis of the transfinitely iterated fixed point theories ID a and ID< a ; the exact proof-theoretic ordinals of these systems are presented. §1. Introduction. The transfinitely iterated fixed point theories ID« are relatives of the better known theories ID Q for iterated inductive definitions. These latter theories have been extensively studied during the last years (cf., e.g., Buchholz et al.[1]) and their proof-theoretic analysis has been carried through… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The theories ID" of n-times iterated inductive definitions have been analyzed by Feferman in connection with Handcock's conjecture in [6]. The proof-theoretic analysis of ID tt has been carried out in all details by Jager, Kahle, Setzer and Strahm [9]. _ Some problems however, have remained unsolved: In the theories ID a , induction on fixed points is dropped completely.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theories ID" of n-times iterated inductive definitions have been analyzed by Feferman in connection with Handcock's conjecture in [6]. The proof-theoretic analysis of ID tt has been carried out in all details by Jager, Kahle, Setzer and Strahm [9]. _ Some problems however, have remained unsolved: In the theories ID a , induction on fixed points is dropped completely.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By combining (10) and (11) and applying persistency, we can finally derive The following main result of this paragraph is the natural generalization of Main Lemma II in Jager, Kahle, Setzer and Strahm [8] PROOF. This theorem is proved by induction on n < a>.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…• n , for all natural numbers n ≥ 1, and to reduce FP • n are the analogues of the well-known fixed point theories ID n , see Feferman [12] or Jäger, Kahle, Setzer, and Strahm [18], but with ID 1 rather than PA as the base theory. The languages L…”
Section: Finitely Iterated Fixed Point Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%