2022
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac704b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Proper Motion of the Pulsar J1124–5916 in the Galactic Supernova Remnant G292.0+1.8

Abstract: We present the first direct measurement of the proper motion of pulsar J1124–5916 in the young, oxygen-rich supernova remnant G292.0+1.8. Using deep Chandra ACIS-I observations from 2006 to 2016, we measure a positional change of 0.″21 ± 0.″05 over the ∼10 yr baseline, or ∼0.″02 yr−1. At a distance of 6.2 ± 0.9 kpc, this corresponds to a kick velocity in the plane of the sky of 612 ± 152 km s−1. We compare this direct measurement against the velocity inferred from estimates based on the center of mass of the e… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To obtain astrometric corrections for each observation, we first needed to obtain precise point-source positions that took the detector point-spread function (PSF) into account. For this, we followed the methods of past papers (e.g., Mayer et al 2020;Long et al 2022). We produce PSF simulations using the CIAO Chandra Ray Tracer (ChaRT) tool, 3 generating five iterations of each point source with a monochromatic spectrum of 1 keV with 0.01 photons cm −2 s −1 .…”
Section: Point-spread Function Modeling and Fittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To obtain astrometric corrections for each observation, we first needed to obtain precise point-source positions that took the detector point-spread function (PSF) into account. For this, we followed the methods of past papers (e.g., Mayer et al 2020;Long et al 2022). We produce PSF simulations using the CIAO Chandra Ray Tracer (ChaRT) tool, 3 generating five iterations of each point source with a monochromatic spectrum of 1 keV with 0.01 photons cm −2 s −1 .…”
Section: Point-spread Function Modeling and Fittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only Chandra has sufficient spatial resolution to measure the proper motions of NSs, and doing so requires baselines of at least a decade for all but the closest objects. There are currently ∼20 velocity measurements of NSs embedded within SNRs, found using a mix of direct proper-motion measurements (e.g., Auchettl et al 2015;Temim et al 2017;Shternin et al 2019;Mayer & Becker 2021;Long et al 2022) and measuring the distances between NS positions and estimated SNR explosion sites (e.g., Winkler et al 2009;Banovetz et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gold standard for making such claims is accurate pulsar proper motion and parallax measurements. Often both the magnitude and direction of the proper motion can reinforce the claimed association by showing that the pulsar likely originated near the geometric center of the SNR (Deller et al 2012;Van Etten et al 2012;Shternin et al 2019;Johnston & Lower 2021;Long et al 2022). In other cases, proper motion measurements either exclude an association or require more complex scenarios to remain tenable (Brisken et al 2006;de Vries et al 2021;Espinoza et al 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tracking metal-rich ejecta over many years and measuring their proper motions enable estimates of the center of expansion (CoE) and explosion age, as well as information about the progenitor system's circumstellar material (CSM) environment via ejecta interaction. The CoE and explosion age are important values for determining the kick velocity of compact objects (Vogt et al 2018;Banovetz et al 2021;Long et al 2022), searching for surviving companions (Kerzendorf et al 2019;Li et al 2021), and measuring differences between optical and X-ray centers (Katsuda et al 2018). These values can also serve as important tests for increasingly sophisticated 2D and 3D supernova simulations (e.g., Wongwathanarat et al 2015;Janka et al 2016;Burrows et al 2019;Ferrand et al 2021;Orlando et al 2021Orlando et al , 2022.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%