2022
DOI: 10.21801/ppcrj.2022.82.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The pros and cons of tDCS as a therapeutic tool in the rehabilitation of chronic pain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the use of this technique on the pharyngeal motor cortex in patients with post-stroke dysphagia has previously been shown to lead to swallowing improvements (Yang et al, 2012;Li et al, 2020). tDCS is affordable, has low side effects and can be easily implemented in a rehabilitation setting (Barra et al, 2022;Ho et al, 2022). Compared with tDCS, rTMS requires specialised equipment and trained clinicians (Rossi et al, 2009), and the device is more expensive and difficult to transport (Priori et al, 2009).…”
Section: Swallowing Therapies In Patients With Docmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the use of this technique on the pharyngeal motor cortex in patients with post-stroke dysphagia has previously been shown to lead to swallowing improvements (Yang et al, 2012;Li et al, 2020). tDCS is affordable, has low side effects and can be easily implemented in a rehabilitation setting (Barra et al, 2022;Ho et al, 2022). Compared with tDCS, rTMS requires specialised equipment and trained clinicians (Rossi et al, 2009), and the device is more expensive and difficult to transport (Priori et al, 2009).…”
Section: Swallowing Therapies In Patients With Docmentioning
confidence: 99%