2021
DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Prospective Observational Cohort and the Nested Randomized Controlled Trial in the Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Colorectal Cancer (PulMiCC Study) Question the Reliance on Existing Evidence for the Magnitude of Benefit From Lung Metastasectomy

Abstract: The prospective observational cohort and the nested randomized controlled trial in the Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Colorectal Cancer (PulMiCC Study) question the reliance on existing evidence for the magnitude of benefit from lung metastasectomy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We are grateful to Dr Treasure and colleagues for their letter to AJCO supporting our intention to challenge the status quo related to surveillance for colorectal metastases in the elderly patient 1. Our study2 specifically set out to assess publications comparing treatment outcomes for colorectal cancer (CRC) metastases in older and younger patient cohorts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are grateful to Dr Treasure and colleagues for their letter to AJCO supporting our intention to challenge the status quo related to surveillance for colorectal metastases in the elderly patient 1. Our study2 specifically set out to assess publications comparing treatment outcomes for colorectal cancer (CRC) metastases in older and younger patient cohorts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%