The Protection Of Human Rights In Southeast Asia: Improving The Effectiveness Of Civil Society

Gomez, James; Ramcharan, Robin

doi:10.1163/138819012x13323234710062

Cited by 11 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Salah satu bentuk dari perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia adalah perlindungan terhadap data pribadi seseorang dimana di negara lain hal tersebut telah diakui sebagai HAM yaitu dalam Piagam HAM Eropa (ECHR, 2000) dan Deklarasi HAM ASEAN (Gomez & Ramcharan, 2012). Deklarasi Universal HAM (UDHR,1948) yang terbentuk pada tahun 1948 pada akhirnya mengakui hak untuk melindungi data pribadi sebagai HAM setelah melalui proses evolusi yang panjang, dimana hak tersebut terbentuk dari persilangan antara hak atas informasi dan hak atas privasi.…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Perlindungan Data Pribadi sebagai Perwujudan Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia

Luthfi

2022

SOSTECH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM) adalah hak kodrat atau kodrat yang bersifat abadi dan universal yang dimiliki setiap orang. Bagi negara, hak asasi manusia merupakan dasar bagi negara untuk membentuk peraturan perundang-undangan dalam kehidupan berbangsa dan bernegara serta kehidupan bermasyarakat. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan memahami bentuk perlindungan hukum terhadap data pribadi di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif (legal research), dengan menerapkan norma-norma atau kaidah-kaidah yang berlaku dalam hukum positif dengan cara mengkaji berbagai macam peraturan perundang-undangan. Berdasarkan penelitian yang dilakukan, dapat disimpulkan bahwa perlindungan data pribadi merupakan hak konstitusional warga negara Indonesia, sebagaimana tertuang dalam Pasal 28 G(1) UUD 1945.

show abstract

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Perlindungan Data Pribadi sebagai Perwujudan Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia

Luthfi

2022

SOSTECH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The second Work Plan of 2016-2020 is more detailed in comparison with its predecessor because it designates clearly the years that AICHR should complete each work stipulated in the plan. An interesting and creative point in this work plan concerns the idea to 'engage in dialogue and consultation with civil society and other stakeholders' as provided for in mandate 4.8-an idea never formally realized by the AICHR before as previous AICHR-CSO engagements were obviously informal and noninclusive (Gomez & Ramcharan, 2013). The feature of this work plan signals the possibility for an increasingly formal relation between the AICHR and CSOs starting in 2015.…”

Section: Institutional Theory With the Aichr's Functions: Significances And Expansion Of Power To Improve Human Rightsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Regional Institutional Development of Human Rights in Southeast Asia

Netipatalachoochote

Ciacchi

Holzhacker

2021

Challenges of Governance

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The deliberation on a Southeast Asian human rights regime dates back to the 1993 World Conference on Human Rights in Vienna. From then, the emergence of an idea on regional institutional human rights development arose to address the absence of human rights mechanisms in the region. This chapter offers a critical analysis on the human rights institutional development in ASEAN. The initial focus of the chapter is on illustrating the step by step progress toward the establishment of an ASEAN human rights institution. This progress will lead to the understanding of how the demand for a human rights institution has been made by ASEAN. The arguments here are supported by the analysis of the Joint Communiqués of the ASEAN Ministerial Meetings (AMM) from 1993 to 2010 and the Workshop statements of the Working Group for an ASEAN Human Rights Mechanism (Working Group) which documents ASEAN elite's official speeches and opinions. The analysis on this point demonstrates ASEAN's attempt to build regional agents in terms of human rights. The principal-agent theory is applied to offer understanding on the logical relationship between member states (principal) and regional human rights institutions (agent). Institutional theory is applied with respect to the second point of this analysis, which is to scrutinize the creation of a human rights institution known as the ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights (AICHR). The functions of the AICHR are illustrated through an investigation of its mandates, work plans and statements of meetings since the year of establishment to clarify why regional human rights institutions have been vital and particularly how the S. Netipatalachoochote (*) Faculty of Law and the

show abstract

“…Yet, despite these aspirations, assessments of CSO engagement with ASEAN and the ability of CSOs to have a meaningful impact on ASEAN policies have been less than positive (Collins 2008;Gerard 2013;Gomez and Ramcharan 2012;Nesadurai 2009 ). Fruitful studies in this area thus far have often focused on CSO contributions to ASEAN policies related to human rights, and developments such as the creation of the ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights and the signing of an ASEAN Human Rights Declaration (Gomez and Ramcharan 2012).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Fruitful studies in this area thus far have often focused on CSO contributions to ASEAN policies related to human rights, and developments such as the creation of the ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights and the signing of an ASEAN Human Rights Declaration (Gomez and Ramcharan 2012). There have also been studies engaging with the nexus between civil society participation and comprehensive conceptions of security, but none undertaken with regard to NTS specifically.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

ASEAN's ‘people-oriented’ aspirations: civil society influences on non-traditional security governance

Allison

Taylor

2016

Australian Journal of International Affairs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since the Asian financial crisis, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) has sought to reorient itself towards becoming a 'people-oriented' association. Democratic transitions in the region and increased demands from civil society to be actively involved in regional governance have prompted ASEAN to develop forms of participatory regionalism. In practice, however, the rhetorical aspirations of ASEAN have not often matched the level of participation or support expected by civil society organisations. It has often been the case that ASEAN's decisions, especially those related to sensitive issues, have been influenced by external pressure as opposed to participatory mechanisms. The aim of this article is to determine to what extent participatory mechanisms impact ASEAN's approach to non-traditional security. By doing so, the authors combine two key elements central to a 'peopleoriented' approach to regionalism: the incorporation of deliberative and participatory processes and the acknowledgement of transboundary security issues which require cooperation to move beyond state-centric approaches. This article explains that despite the rhetorical emphasis on participatory regionalism, it continues to be the case that regional civil society organisations and non-state actors have limited capacity to influence ASEAN. By providing a critical analysis of influences on ASEAN's non-traditional security policies, the authors offer a modest yet valuable contribution to the emerging literature on ASEAN's 'people-oriented' regionalism and advance a nuanced understanding of ASEAN's participatory mechanisms.

show abstract

The Protection Of Human Rights In Southeast Asia: Improving The Effectiveness Of Civil Society

Cited by 11 publications

References 0 publications

Perlindungan Data Pribadi sebagai Perwujudan Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia

Perlindungan Data Pribadi sebagai Perwujudan Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia

The Regional Institutional Development of Human Rights in Southeast Asia

ASEAN's ‘people-oriented’ aspirations: civil society influences on non-traditional security governance

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About